Blockchain for Environmental Governance: Can Smart Contracts Reinforce Payments for Ecosystem Services in Namibia?

被引:17
|
作者
Oberhauser, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
blockchain; smart contract; oracle; land cover classification; payments for ecosystem services; community-based natural resource management; MOBILE PHONE COMMUNICATION; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; IMPACTS; PROGRAM; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2019.00021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Global South harbors some of the planet's most precious natural resources and is hence key in addressing the pressing environmental challenges of the Anthropocene. Here, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have recently gained importance as a means of environmental governance, increasingly complementing conventional command-and-control approaches. For instance, climate change is now mitigated through carbon offset payments and biodiversity loss is addressed through wildlife conservation performance payments. However, such payment schemes in the Global South face numerous challenges as identified by a large body of literature. This paper investigates if blockchain technology can help address some of the challenges by reinforcing PES programs with tamper-proof blockchain smart contracts. To this end, the paper presents a proof-of-concept of a blockchain-based wildlife conservation performance payments scheme in Namibia: the habitat integrity of an elephant corridor is assessed by remote sensing algorithms, which in turn trigger fictitious blockchain smart contract payments to surrounding communities. The application allows to practically discuss the potential of blockchain technology regarding three key aspects of PES: (i) effectiveness (conditionality) of environmental monitoring (ii) efficiency and transaction costs, as well as (iii) equity and benefit distribution. The case presented here is an example for linking the digital Blockchain sphere to practical challenges of natural resource management in the physical world. As such, it illustrates some potentials of the technology, but also shows how Blockchain technology is unlikely to provide transformative solutions in geographies with complex environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consortium Blockchain Smart Contracts for Musical Rights Governance in a Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) Use Case
    Kapsoulis, Nikolaos
    Psychas, Alexandros
    Palaiokrassas, Georgios
    Marinakis, Achilleas
    Litke, Antonios
    Varvarigou, Theodora
    Bouchlis, Charalampos
    Raouzaiou, Amaryllis
    Calvo, Goncal
    Escudero Subirana, Jordi
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2020, 12 (08):
  • [32] Identifying payments for ecosystem services participants through social or spatial targeting? Exploring the outcomes of group level contracts
    McGrath, Francesca L.
    Leimona, Beria
    Amaruzaman, Sacha
    Rahadian, Nana P.
    Carrasco, Luis R.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 1 (07)
  • [33] I Can Get Some Satisfaction: Fuzzy Ontologies for Partial Agreements in Blockchain Smart Contracts
    Huitzil, Ignacio
    Fuentemilla, Alvaro
    Bobillo, Fernando
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2020,
  • [34] Whose environmental justice? Exploring local and global perspectives in a payments for ecosystem services scheme in Rwanda
    Martin, Adrian
    Gross-Camp, Nicole
    Kebede, Bereket
    McGuire, Shawn
    Munyarukaza, Joseph
    GEOFORUM, 2014, 54 : 167 - 177
  • [35] PES What a Mess? An Analysis of the Position of Environmental Professionals in the Conceptual Debate on Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Martin-Ortega, Julia
    Waylen, Kerry A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 154 : 218 - 237
  • [36] Can Payments for Ecosystem Services Contribute to Adaptation to Climate Change? Insights from a Watershed in Kenya
    van de Sand, Isabel
    Mwangi, John K.
    Namirembe, Sara
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (01):
  • [37] Everyday Environmental Justice in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Insights From Two Protected Areas in China
    He, Jun
    CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2023, 21 (03) : 153 - 164
  • [38] Abbildung von Intercompany-Verträgen auf der Blockchain durch Smart Contracts – eine Fallstudie am Beispiel von IT-ServicesThe Mapping of Intercompany Contracts on the Blockchain by Smart Contracts—A Case Study Using the Example of IT Services
    Stefan Tönnissen
    Frank Teuteberg
    HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2018, 55 (6) : 1167 - 1184
  • [39] Payments for ecosystem services in relation to US and UK agri-environmental policy: disruptive neoliberal innovation or hybrid policy adaptation?
    Potter, Clive A.
    Wolf, Steven A.
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2014, 31 (03) : 397 - 408
  • [40] Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City
    Connolly, James J.
    Svendsen, Erika S.
    Fisher, Dana R.
    Campbell, Lindsay K.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 109 (01) : 76 - 84