Blockchain for Environmental Governance: Can Smart Contracts Reinforce Payments for Ecosystem Services in Namibia?

被引:17
|
作者
Oberhauser, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
blockchain; smart contract; oracle; land cover classification; payments for ecosystem services; community-based natural resource management; MOBILE PHONE COMMUNICATION; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; IMPACTS; PROGRAM; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2019.00021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Global South harbors some of the planet's most precious natural resources and is hence key in addressing the pressing environmental challenges of the Anthropocene. Here, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have recently gained importance as a means of environmental governance, increasingly complementing conventional command-and-control approaches. For instance, climate change is now mitigated through carbon offset payments and biodiversity loss is addressed through wildlife conservation performance payments. However, such payment schemes in the Global South face numerous challenges as identified by a large body of literature. This paper investigates if blockchain technology can help address some of the challenges by reinforcing PES programs with tamper-proof blockchain smart contracts. To this end, the paper presents a proof-of-concept of a blockchain-based wildlife conservation performance payments scheme in Namibia: the habitat integrity of an elephant corridor is assessed by remote sensing algorithms, which in turn trigger fictitious blockchain smart contract payments to surrounding communities. The application allows to practically discuss the potential of blockchain technology regarding three key aspects of PES: (i) effectiveness (conditionality) of environmental monitoring (ii) efficiency and transaction costs, as well as (iii) equity and benefit distribution. The case presented here is an example for linking the digital Blockchain sphere to practical challenges of natural resource management in the physical world. As such, it illustrates some potentials of the technology, but also shows how Blockchain technology is unlikely to provide transformative solutions in geographies with complex environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Governance of Payments for Ecosystem Ecosystem services influences social and environmental outcomes in Costa Rica
    Brownson, Katherine
    Anderson, Elizabeth P.
    Ferreira, Susana
    Wenger, Seth
    Fowler, Laurie
    German, Laura
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 174
  • [2] Payments for environmental and ecosystem services for water production
    Leitao, Alexander Matos
    da Silva, Luciana Ferreira
    NATIVA, 2022, 10 (02): : 269 - 276
  • [3] Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts in Decentralized Governance Systems
    Balcerzak, Adam P.
    Nica, Elvira
    Rogalska, Elzbieta
    Poliak, Milos
    Kliestik, Tomas
    Sabie, Oana-Matilda
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [4] INFLUENCE OF BLOCKCHAIN AND SMART CONTRACTS ON PARTNERS' TRUST, VISIBILITY, COMPETITIVENESS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN MANUFACTURING SUPPLY CHAINS
    Chen, Ping-Kuo
    He, Qiu-Rui
    Chu, Shiping
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 23 (04) : 754 - 772
  • [5] Payments for Ecosystem Services, neoliberalisation, and the hybrid governance of land management in Australia
    Higgins, Vaughan
    Dibden, Jacqui
    Potter, Clive
    Moon, Katie
    Cocklin, Chris
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2014, 36 : 463 - 474
  • [6] Semantic Smart Contracts for Blockchain-based Services in the Internet of Things
    Baqa, Hamza
    Truong, Nguyen B.
    Crespi, Noel
    Lee, Gyu Myoung
    Le Gall, Franck
    2019 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORK COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (NCA), 2019, : 55 - 59
  • [7] Fair payments for verifiable cloud services using smart contracts
    Dorsala, Mallikarjun Reddy
    Sastry, V. N.
    Chapram, Sudhakar
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2020, 90
  • [8] Determinants of the environmental conservation and poverty alleviation objectives of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs
    Ola, Oreoluwa
    Menapace, Luisa
    Benjamin, Emmanuel
    Lang, Hannes
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 35 : 52 - 66
  • [9] Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services?
    Robert, Nicolas
    Stenger, Anne
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 35 : 83 - 91
  • [10] Can payments for ecosystem services schemes mimic markets?
    Scheufele, Gabriela
    Bennett, Jeff
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 23 : 30 - 37