Consultation to review clinical placement processes: A quality assurance project

被引:1
作者
Sheeran, Leanne [1 ]
Ridgway, Lael [2 ]
Buchanan, Kerrie [1 ]
Wilson, Diana [2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, POB 71, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Judith Lumley Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
Child and family health; Clinical practice; Nursing education; Primary health care; Collaboration; MENTAL-HEALTH; COMMUNITY; EDUCATION; NURSES; STUDENTS; CHILD;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103331
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: Working in partnership is a key goal for nursing and community health practice. This case study reports the quality assurance process employed to enhance the process of allocating clinical places for postgraduate Maternal and Child Health nurses in Victoria, Australia. Background: The review of the clinical placement process occurred because councils (placement providers) reported being overwhelmed with inquiries and applications for places, time-line issues and some confusion about processes. This situation was further compounded as these clinical placements were provided by Councils at no cost to universities or students. Design: The Quality Assurance consultation process was guided by an action research approach and systematically explored the experience of municipalities hosting students. Method: This involved five discrete phases: Online survey 1, Focus group, Draft consultation report, Online survey 2 and Distribution of Maternal and Child Health clinical placement process packages. Feedback was reported regarding what was working well, challenges with existing student placements and suggested strategies to improve the student placement process. Results: Collaboration led to improvements in the clinical placement process and produced key resources for stakeholders. An unexpected outcome of the process was the development of a List of Expectations and Responsibilities for all stakeholders. Conclusion: The councils providing MCH clinical experience are highly valued by the universities and their students as clinical placement is provided voluntarily as a contribution to the MCH profession. All parties indicated it was very beneficial to collaborate to optimise this process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Ethical considerations in quality assurance and evaluation activities
[2]   Expanding the clinical placement capacity of rural hospitals in Australia: Displacing Peta to place Paul? [J].
Barnett, Tony ;
Walker, Lorraine E. ;
Jacob, Elisabeth ;
Missen, Karen ;
Cross, Merylin D. ;
Shahwan-Akl, Lina .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2012, 32 (05) :485-489
[3]  
Bourgeois Sharon, 2011, Nurse Educ Pract, V11, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.005
[4]   Rural Embedded Assistants for Community Health (REACH) Network: First-Person Accounts in a Community-University Partnership [J].
Brown, Louis D. ;
Alter, Theodore R. ;
Brown, Leigh Gordon ;
Corbin, Marilyn A. ;
Flaherty-Craig, Claire ;
McPhail, Lindsay G. ;
Nevel, Pauline ;
Shoop, Kimbra ;
Sterner, Glenn, III ;
Terndrup, Thomas E. ;
Weaver, M. Ellen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 51 (1-2) :206-216
[5]  
Department of Health and Human Services, 2016, ROAD MAP REF
[6]  
Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS), 2019, MATERNAL CHILD HLTH
[7]  
Diaconia University of Applied Science, 2020, CURR 2020 BACH DEGR
[8]   New models to support the professional education of health visitors: A qualitative study of the role of space and place in creating 'community of learning hubs' [J].
Donetto, Sara ;
Malone, Mary ;
Sayer, Lynn ;
Robert, Glenn .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 54 :69-76
[9]  
Ellis R., 2019, Handbook of Quality Assurance for University Teaching
[10]  
Emanuel Vernel, 2013, Nurs Times, V109, P18