Testing theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

被引:56
作者
Willard, Aiyana K. [1 ]
Cingl, Lubomir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, 116 Inner Campus Dr Stop G6000, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Econ Prague, Fac Econ, Dept Inst Environm & Expt Econ, Nam Winstona Churchilla 1938-4, Prague 13067 3, Czech Republic
关键词
Secularization; Religion; Cognitive biases; Credibility enhancing displays; Cultural transmission; CULTURAL TRANSMISSION; PARANORMAL BELIEF; ATHEISM; EVOLUTION; EDUCATION; DISBELIEF; MARKUSSON; DISPLAYS; SOCIETY; GEERTZ;
D O I
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several theoretical approaches have been proposed to explain variation in religiosity, including versions of secularization hypotheses, evolved cognitive biases, and cultural transmission. In this paper we test several theories that aim to explain variation in religiosity and compare them in a representative sample collected in the Czech Republic and Slovakia (N = 2022). These two countries represent a natural experiment in religiosity; despite their high level of historical, institutional and cultural similarity, their populations differ markedly in the rate of religious belief. We examine the predictive power of cognitive biases (anthropomorphism, dualism, teleology, mentalizing, and analytic thinking); institutional insecurity; and exposure to credibility displays of belief in childhood on various factors of religious belief. We find that individual differences in cognitive biases predicted 8% of the variance belief in God, but predicted 21% of the variance in paranormal beliefs and almost no variance in religious participation. Perceived institutional insecurity explains little variance in any of these variables, but cultural transmission, measured as exposure to credibility enhancing displays (CREDs) and church attendance in childhood, predicted 17% of the variance in belief in God and 30% of religious participation, and mediated 70% of the difference between these two countries in belief in God and 80% of the difference in religious practice. These findings suggest cognitive biases may explain the existence of belief in the supernatural generally, but cultural transmission thrbugh credible belief displays is a more plausible explanation for why people adopt and maintain a specific set of religious beliefs and practices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 615
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   SECULARIZATION, HIGHER-EDUCATION, AND RELIGIOSITY [J].
ALBRECHT, SL ;
HEATON, TB .
REVIEW OF RELIGIOUS RESEARCH, 1984, 26 (01) :43-58
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1967, SACRED CANOPY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, FUTURE RELIG SECULAR, DOI DOI 10.1525/9780520341340
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1904, PROTESTANT ETHIC SPI
[5]  
[Anonymous], UN STAT
[6]   Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion [J].
Atran, S ;
Norenzayan, A .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2004, 27 (06) :713-+
[7]   The Evolution of Religion: How Cognitive By-Products, Adaptive Learning Heuristics, Ritual Displays, and Group Competition Generate Deep Commitments to Prosocial Religions [J].
Atran S. ;
Henrich J. .
Biological Theory, 2010, 5 (1) :18-30
[8]  
Atran Scott., 2002, GODS WE TRUST EVOLUT
[9]   The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
Wheelwright, S .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2004, 34 (02) :163-175
[10]  
Barrett David., 2001, World Christian Encyclopedia. 2 vols, V2nd