Large-Scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an Artificial Intelligence and applications perspective

被引:193
作者
Ding, Ru-Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Palomares, Ivan [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Xueqing [1 ]
Yang, Guo-Rui [1 ]
Liu, Bingsheng [1 ,6 ]
Dong, Yucheng [7 ]
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique [3 ,8 ]
Herrera, Francisco [3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Granada, Andalusian Res Inst Data Sci & Computat Intellige, Granada, Spain
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Comp Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
[6] Chongqing Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[7] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[8] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Fac Engn, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[9] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Large-scale decision making; Group decision making; Consensus reaching processes; Behaviour management; Subgroup clustering; Artificial Intelligence; Preference modelling; PERSONALIZED INDIVIDUAL SEMANTICS; LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION MODEL; CONSENSUS REACHING PROCESS; NONCOOPERATIVE BEHAVIORS; TERM SETS; PREFERENCE; INFORMATION; AGGREGATION; SYSTEMS; MAKERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.006
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The last decade witnessed tremendous developments in social media and e-democracy technologies. A fundamental aspect in these paradigms is that the number of decision makers allowed to partake in a decision making event drastically increases. As a result Large Scale Decision Making (LSDM) has established itself as an emerging and rapidly developing research field, attracting comprehensive studies in the last decade. LSDM events are a complex class of decision making problems, in which multiple and highly diverse stakeholders are involved and the provided alternatives are assessed considering multiple criteria/attributes. Since some of the extant LSDM research was extended from group decision making scenarios, there is no established definition for a LSDM problem as of yet. We firstly propose a clear definition and characterization of LSDM events as a basis for characterizing this emerging family of decision frameworks. Secondly, a classification of LSDM literature is provided. Effectively solving an LSDM problem is usually a complex and challenging process, in which reaching a high consensus or accounting for the agreement or conflict relationships between participants becomes critical. Accordingly, we present a taxonomy and an overview of LSDM models, predicated on their key elements, i.e. the procedures and specific steps followed by the existing models: consensus measurement, subgroup clustering, behavior management, and consensus building mechanisms. Finally, we provide a discussion in which we identify research challenges and propose future research directions under a triple perspective: key LSDM methodologies, AI and data fusion for LSDM, and innovative applications. The potential rise of AI-based LSDM is particularly highlighted in the discussion provided.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 102
页数:19
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Learning of aggregation models in multi criteria decision making [J].
Aggarwal, Manish .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 119 :1-9
[2]  
Alharthi H, 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CROWDSOURCING IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (CSI-SE), P1, DOI [10.1109/CSI-SE.2016.009, 10.1145/2897659.2897661]
[3]   A Fuzzy Group Decision Making Model for Large Groups of Individuals [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 2009, :643-+
[4]  
Atanassov K.T., 1999, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications
[5]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[6]   Aggregation of analytic hierarchy process models based on similarities in decision makers' preferences [J].
Bolloju, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 128 (03) :499-508
[7]   Intelligent tourism recommender systems: A survey [J].
Borras, Joan ;
Moreno, Antonio ;
Valls, Aida .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (16) :7370-7389
[8]   A Historical Account of Types of Fuzzy Sets and Their Relationships [J].
Bustince, Humberto ;
Barrenechea, Edurne ;
Pagola, Miguel ;
Fernandez, Javier ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Bedregal, Benjamin ;
Montero, Javier ;
Hagras, Hani ;
Herrera, Francisco ;
De Baets, Bernard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 24 (01) :179-194
[9]   A multi-stage conflict style large group emergency decision-making method [J].
Cai, Chen-guang ;
Xu, Xuan-hua ;
Wang, Pei ;
Chen, Xiao-hong .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (19) :5765-5778
[10]   Representing decision-makers using styles of behavior: An approach designed for group decision support systems [J].
Carneiro, Joao ;
Saraiva, Pedro ;
Martinho, Diogo ;
Marreiros, Goreti ;
Novais, Paulo .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 47 :109-132