Static characteristics analysis of three-tower suspension bridges with central buckle using a simplified model

被引:31
作者
Cao, Hongyou [1 ]
Chen, Yupeng [1 ]
Li, Jun [2 ]
Liu, Shuang [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] China Railway Siyuan Survey & Design Grp Co LTD, Wuhan 430063, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Hydraul, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Three-tower suspension bridge; Mid-tower effect; Central buckle; Deflection-to-span; Sliding resistance coefficient;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112916
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Compared with traditional two-tower suspension bridges, three-tower suspension bridges have to face challenges caused by the mid-tower effect, which requires the stiffness of the mid-tower satisfying two contradictory parameters, the deflection-to-span and the saddle sliding resistance coefficient, simultaneously. Meanwhile, the central buckles are often utilized to reduce the live load deflection and the torsional vibration caused by wind in two-tower suspension bridges. This study proposes an analytical model for predicting the structural responses of three-tower suspension bridges with central buckle under vehicle loads and examines the effect of the central buckle on suppressing the mid-tower effect. The analytical model simplifies the bridge as a series of cables with horizontal spring constraints. The validation analysis based on the structural parameters of the Yingwuzhou Yangtze River Bridge using the nonlinear finite element method demonstrates that the error of the proposed model does not exceed 5%. The parametric investigations show that the central buckle can significantly improve the performance of three-tower suspension bridges by enhancing their stiffness and reducing the unbalanced tension of the main cable on both sides of the mid-tower. Three-tower suspension bridge with central buckle has a much wider feasible mid-tower stiffness range than that of the traditional three-tower suspension bridges, and the critical dead-to-live load ratio for the feasible dimensionless stiffness range has decreased from 6.7 to 4.4.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, JTGTD65052015
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Cable Supported Bridges: Concept and Design
[3]   Feasible Range for Midtower Lateral Stiffness in Three-Tower Suspension Bridges [J].
Cao, Hongyou ;
Qian, Xudong ;
Zhou, Yunlai ;
Chen, Zhijun ;
Zhu, Hongping .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2018, 23 (03)
[4]   Form-finding analysis of suspension bridges using an explicit Iterative approach [J].
Cao, Hongyou ;
Zhou, Yun-Lai ;
Chen, Zhijun ;
Wahab, Magd Abdel .
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2017, 62 (01) :85-95
[5]   Layout and size optimization of suspension bridges based on coupled modelling approach and enhanced particle swarm optimization [J].
Cao, Hongyou ;
Qian, Xudong ;
Chen, Zhijun ;
Zhu, Hongping .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 146 :170-183
[6]  
Chai S, 2016, STRUCT ENG INT, P26
[7]   Longitudinal Restraint of a Double-Cable Suspension Bridge [J].
Chai, Shengbo ;
Xiao, Rucheng ;
Li, Xiaonian .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (04)
[8]   Improved Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Form-Finding Method for Suspension Bridge Installation Analysis [J].
Chen, Zhijun ;
Cao, Hongyou ;
Ye, Kun ;
Zhu, Hongping ;
Li, Shaofan .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 (03)
[9]   Study on midtower longitudinal stiffness of three-tower four-span suspension bridges with steel truss girders [J].
Cheng, Jin ;
Xu, Hang ;
Xu, Mingsai .
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2020, 73 (06) :641-649
[10]  
Cheng Z, 2017, J BRIDGE ENG, V22