Perspectives on Driving Changes in Project-based Cumulative Effects Assessment for Biodiversity: Lessons from the Canadian Experience

被引:16
作者
Alves Dibo, Ana Paula [1 ]
Noble, Bram F. [2 ]
Sanchez, Luis Enrique [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Politecn, Dept Min & Petr Engn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
Practitioners; Scoping; Information management; Knowledge management; Environmental impact assessment; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; SCALE; OPPORTUNITIES; PERCEPTIONS; COMPONENTS; FRAMEWORK; WILDLIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-018-1086-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cumulative effects assessment (CEA), as a required practice for the environmental assessment (EA) of projects in many countries, faces several practical challenges, especially related to biodiversity. Drawing on the perspectives and experiences of Canadian EA practitioners, this paper explores options or drivers of change for improving project-based assessment to better tackle cumulative effects on biodiversity. An on-line survey was conducted with 40 professionals from the private sector, government departments/agencies, universities, and non-governmental organizations, examining the current challenges and opportunities regarding: CEA process for biodiversity; responsibilities for undertaking CEA tasks; resources to support and promote good CEA practice. In terms of process, there is shared understanding on: (i) the need of EA terms of reference to provide specific directions on CEA; (ii) CEA should capture both human and natural drivers of cumulative change; (iii) spatial boundaries for CEA should be based on ecological boundaries. There are dissenting views about: (i) whether CEA should consider all valued components (VCs) potentially affected by a project or only those for which residual effects are predicted; and (ii) delimitation of future temporal limits. In terms of responsibilities, participants agreed that project proponents should retain a central role in conducting CEA, but government agencies should lead the collection/provision of information about other projects in the study area and baseline VC conditions. Information and knowledge management resources could be also applied in the context of governmental agencies and consultancy firms to support CEA for biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 941
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GOOD PRACT HDB CUM I
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, HABITAT EVALUATION S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, HABITAT EVALUATION P
[4]  
[Anonymous], METHODS ENV SOCIAL I
[5]   Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes [J].
Argote, L ;
McEvily, B ;
Reagans, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :571-582
[6]  
Aura Environmental Research and Consulting Ltd, 2016, REV APPL CUM EFF ASS
[7]   Scale, assessment components, and reference conditions: Issues for cumulative effects assessment in Canadian watersheds [J].
Ball, Murray ;
Somers, Gila ;
Wilson, Julie E. ;
Tanna, Rajiv ;
Chung, Cecilia ;
Duro, Dennis C. ;
Seitz, Nicole .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 (03) :370-379
[8]  
Baxter W., 2001, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V19, P253, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154601781766916
[9]  
Berube M., 2007, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V25, P101, DOI 10.3152/146155107X197913
[10]   The inclusion of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment: Policy-related progress limited by gaps and semantic confusion [J].
Bigard, Charlotte ;
Pioch, Sylvain ;
Thompson, John D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 200 :35-45