Machine Learning-Based Production Prediction Model and Its Application in Duvernay Formation

被引:12
作者
Guo, Zekun [1 ]
Wang, Hongjun [1 ]
Kong, Xiangwen [1 ]
Li Shen [1 ]
Jia, Yuepeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Inst Petr Explorat & Dev CNPC, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
machine learning; sensitivity analysis; production prediction; grey relation analysis; RESERVOIRS; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.3390/en14175509
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The production of a single gas well is influenced by many geological and completion factors. The aim of this paper is to build a production prediction model based on machine learning technique and identify the most important factor for production. Firstly, around 159 horizontal wells were collected, targeting the Duvernay Formation with detailed geological and completion records. Secondly, the key factors were selected using grey relation analysis and Pearson correlation. Then, three statistical models were built through multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), gaussian process regression (GPR). The model inputs include fluid volume, proppant amount, cluster counts, stage counts, total horizontal lateral length, gas saturation, total organic carbon content, condensate-gas ratio. The model performance was assessed by root mean squared errors (RMSE) and R-squared value. Finally, sensitivity analysis was applied based on best performance model. The analysis shows following conclusions: (1) GPR model shows the best performance with the highest R-squared value and the lowest RMSE. In the testing set, the model shows a R-squared of 0.8 with a RMSE of 280.54 x 10(4) m(3) in the prediction of cumulative gas production within 1st 6 producing months and gives a R-squared of 0.83 with a RMSE of 1884.3 t in the prediction of cumulative oil production within 1st 6 producing months (2) Sensitivity analysis based on GPR model indicates that condensate-gas ratio, fluid volume, and total organic carbon content are the most important features to cumulative oil production within 1st 6 producing months. Fluid volume, Stages, and total organic carbon content are the most significant factors to cumulative gas production within 1st 6 producing months. The analysis progress and results developed in this study will assist companies to build prediction models and figure out which factors control well performance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Construction and verification of a machine learning-based prediction model of deep vein thrombosis formation after spinal surgery
    Wu, Xingyan
    Wang, Zhao
    Zheng, Leilei
    Yang, Yihui
    Shi, Wenyan
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Dexing
    Zhang, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 192
  • [32] A Novel Shale Gas Production Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning and Its Application in Optimization of Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells
    Wang, Huijun
    Qiao, Lu
    Lu, Shuangfang
    Chen, Fangwen
    Fang, Zhixiong
    He, Xipeng
    Zhang, Jun
    He, Taohua
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [33] A machine learning-based prediction model for gout in hyperuricemics: a nationwide cohort study
    Brikman, Shay
    Serfaty, Liel
    Abuhasira, Ran
    Schlesinger, Naomi
    Bieber, Amir
    Rappoport, Nadav
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 63 (09) : 2411 - 2417
  • [34] PRO-OS: A MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PROGNOSTIC PREDICTION MODEL FOR OSTEOSARCOMA
    Zeng, Ke
    Yang, Xiyu
    Mu, Haoran
    Hua, Yingqi
    Cai, Zhengdong
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (02)
  • [35] Machine learning-based prediction of Q-voter model in complex networks
    Pineda, Aruane M.
    Kent, Paul
    Connaughton, Colm
    Rodrigues, Francisco A.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2023, 2023 (12):
  • [36] Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Detection of Biliary Atresia
    Choi, Ho Jung
    Kim, Yeong Eun
    Namgoong, Jung-Man
    Kim, Inki
    Park, Jun Sung
    Baek, Woo Im
    Lee, Byong Sop
    Yoon, Hee Mang
    Cho, Young Ah
    Lee, Jin Seong
    Shim, Jung Ok
    Oh, Seak Hee
    Moon, Jin Soo
    Ko, Jae Sung
    Kim, Dae Yeon
    Kim, Kyung Mo
    GASTRO HEP ADVANCES, 2023, 2 (06): : 778 - 787
  • [37] A machine learning-based model for "In-time" prediction of periprosthetic joint infection
    Chen, Weishen
    Hu, Xuantao
    Gu, Chen
    Zhang, Zhaohui
    Zheng, Linli
    Pan, Baiqi
    Wu, Xiaoyu
    Sun, Wei
    Sheng, Puyi
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [38] Machine learning-based prediction model for patients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Li, Yuan
    Song, Shuang
    Zhu, Liying
    Zhang, Xiaorun
    Mou, Yijiao
    Lei, Maoxing
    Wang, Wenjing
    Tao, Zhen
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [39] Sensor Failure Tolerable Machine Learning-Based Food Quality Prediction Model
    Kaya, Aydin
    Keceli, Ali Seydi
    Catal, Cagatay
    Tekinerdogan, Bedir
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (11) : 1 - 18
  • [40] Novel noninvasive prediction for pulse pressure variation: a machine learning-based model
    Zribi, Benjamin
    Peres, Alexander
    Iluz-Freundlich, Daniel
    Aranbitski, Roussana
    Orbach-Zinger, Sharon
    Livne, Michal Y.
    Loebl, Nadav
    Perl, Leor
    Statlender, Liran
    Raz, Yair
    Fein, Shai
    Azem, Karam
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 134 (04) : 1200 - 1203