Molecular correlates with MGMT promoter methylation and silencing support CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer

被引:81
作者
Ogino, Shuji
Kawasaki, Takako
Kirkner, Gregory J.
Suemoto, Yuko
Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.
Fuchs, Charles S.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Sch Med,BWH Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.2007.119750
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP or CIMP-high) with widespread promoter methylation is a distinct epigenetic phenotype in colorectal cancer. In contrast, a phenotype with less widespread promoter methylation (CIMP-low) has not been well characterised. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and silencing have been associated with G. A mutations and microsatellite instability-low (MSI-low). Aim: To examine molecular correlates with MGMT methylation/silencing in colorectal cancer. Methods: Utilising MethyLight technology, we quantified DNA methylation in MGMT and eight other markers (a CIMP-diagnostic panel; CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, IGF2, MLH1, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1) in 920 population-based colorectal cancers. Results: Tumours with both MGMT methylation and loss were correlated positively with MSI-low (p = 0.02), CIMP-high (>= 6/8 methylated CIMP markers, p = 0.005), CIMP-low (1/8-5/8 methylated CIMP markers, p = 0.002, compared to CIMP-0 with 0/8 methylated markers), KRAS G. A mutation (p = 0.02), and inversely with 18q loss of heterozygosity (p = 0.0002). Tumours were classified into nine MSI/CIMP subtypes. Among the CIMP-low group, tumours with both MGMT methylation and loss were far more frequent in MSI-low tumours (67%, 12/18) than MSI-high tumours (5.6%, 1/18; p = 0.0003) and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours (33%, 52/160; p = 0.008). However, no such relationship was observed among the CIMP-high or CIMP-0 groups. Conclusion: The relationship between MGMT methylation/silencing and MSI-low is limited to only CIMP-low tumours, supporting the suggestion that CIMP-low in colorectal cancer may be a different molecular phenotype from CIMP-high and CIMP-0. Our data support a molecular difference between MSI-low and MSS in colorectal cancer, and a possible link between CIMP-low, MSI-low, MGMT methylation/loss and KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1571
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
AQUILINA G, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P6471
[2]  
Boland CR, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P5248
[3]   Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2 [J].
Chan, Andrew T. ;
Ogino, Shuji ;
Fuchs, Charles S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (21) :2131-2142
[4]   The Nurses' Health Study: Lifestyle and health among women [J].
Colditz, GA ;
Hankinson, SE .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2005, 5 (05) :388-396
[5]   Multiple mutation analyses in single tumor cells with improved whole genome amplification [J].
Dietmaier, W ;
Hartmann, A ;
Wallinger, S ;
Heinmöller, E ;
Kerner, T ;
Endl, E ;
Jauch, KW ;
Hofstädter, F ;
Rüschoff, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 154 (01) :83-95
[6]   Progressive methylation during the serrated neoplasia pathway of the colorectum [J].
Dong, SM ;
Lee, EJ ;
Jeon, ES ;
Park, CK ;
Kim, KM .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 18 (02) :170-178
[7]   MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation [J].
Eads, Cindy A. ;
Danenberg, Kathleen D. ;
Kawakami, Kazuyuki ;
Saltz, Leonard B. ;
Blake, Corey ;
Shibata, Darryl ;
Danenberg, Peter V. ;
Laird, Peter W. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (08) :32
[8]  
Esteller M, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P4689
[9]  
Esteller M, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P2368
[10]   Mutually exclusive promoter hypermethylation patterns of hMLH1 and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase in colorectal cancer [J].
Fox, EJ ;
Leahy, DT ;
Geraghty, R ;
Mulcahy, HE ;
Fennelly, D ;
Hyland, JM ;
O'Donoghue, DP ;
Sheahan, K .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2006, 8 (01) :68-75