Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives

被引:20
作者
Litchfield, Ian [1 ]
Greenfield, Sheila [1 ]
Turner, Grace M. [1 ]
Finnikin, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Calvert, Melanie J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Author qualitative research; family practice; general practitioners; patient perspectives;
D O I
10.3399/bjgpopen20X101135
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The recently announced long- term plan for the NHS is based on a model of personcentred care, which relies on the sustained engagement of patients, shared decision making, and capability for self- management. For a primary care service under increasing pressure from an ageing and chronically ill population, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) appear capable of supporting many of the requirements for person- centred care, yet little is known of the circumstances of their current implementation or how their use might be optimised. Aim: To begin the conversation about how successfully PROMs have been integrated into primary care and how their use might be supported. Design & setting: A qualitative investigation of the perspectives of GPs exploring the use of PROMs as part of routine clinical care in England. Method: Semi- structured telephone interviews were conducted with GPs from across England. The data were analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: A total of 25 interviews were conducted and GPs described the potential benefit of PROMs in a range of circumstances, but also voiced concerns about their reliability and their potential to constrain consultations. Their flexibility meant they had the potential to be incorporated into existing care processes but only with the requisite logistical support. Conclusion: Areas that need to be addressed include the creation of a compelling body of evidence of the benefit of PROMs, appropriate training for staff and patients, and a coherent implementation strategy from policymakers and funding bodies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [11] Arpinelli F, Bamfi F., The FDA guidance for industry on pros: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 4, (2006)
  • [12] Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 4, (2006)
  • [13] Greenhalgh J, Dalkin S, Gooding K., Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care, (2017)
  • [14] Foster A, Croot L, Brazier J, Et al., The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews, J Patient Rep Outcomes, 2, (2018)
  • [15] Hjollund NHI., Individual prognosis of symptom burden and functioning in chronic diseases: a generic method based on patient-reported outcome (pro) measures, J Med Internet Res, 19, 8, (2017)
  • [16] Peters M, Crocker H, Jenkinson C, Et al., The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: a cohort survey, BMJ Open, 4, 2, (2014)
  • [17] Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Et al., A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research, Implementation Sci, 11, 1, (2015)
  • [18] Ilott I, Gerrish K, Booth A, Et al., Testing the consolidated framework for implementation research on health care innovations from South Yorkshire, J Eval Clin Pract, 19, 5, pp. 915-924, (2013)
  • [19] Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Et al., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science, Implement Sci, 4, (2009)
  • [20] Acosta J, Chinman M, Ebener P, Et al., An intervention to improve program implementation: findings from a two-year cluster randomized trial of Assets-Getting to Outcomes, Implement Sci, 8, (2013)