Pricing strategies for information products with network effects and complementary services in a duopolistic market

被引:39
作者
Xu, Biao [1 ]
Yao, Zhong [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Pengfei [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Inst Econ & Business, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
freemium products; premium service; bundling; product complementarity; network effects; duopolistic market; ONLINE SERVICES; FREE TRIAL; GOODS; COMPETITION; SOFTWARE; EXTERNALITIES; COMPATIBILITY; INDUSTRY; PLAY; ASYMMETRY;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2018.1425558
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, we model a fully covered duopoly market in which two firms offer a differentiated information product that exhibits positive network effects and a complementary premium service to consumers. For each firm, there are two marketing strategies: the freemium strategy and the bundling strategy. We find that, under the market equilibrium, a firms' decision whether to employ the freemium strategy or not depends largely on the quality of the information product compared to its rival. When the information product quality is similar and the products' intrinsic values are sufficiently large, both firms will be better off by adopting the freemium strategy, while the bundling strategy will prevail if the products' intrinsic values are sufficiently small. Additionally, when the magnitude of complementary effects or network effects exceeds a given threshold, both firms' profit can be enhanced by an increase in the degree of product complementarity or in the intensity of network effects. We also demonstrate that a firm can benefit from an increasing market size only if the intrinsic value of its information product is sufficiently large. Finally, we extend our model to the uncovered market and derive the equilibrium prices and profits.
引用
收藏
页码:4243 / 4263
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Alha K., 2016, P DIGRA FDG C TAMP
[2]   Network effects, market structure and industry performance [J].
Amir, Rabah ;
Lazzati, Natalia .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2011, 146 (06) :2389-2419
[3]   WHY FIRMS MAY PREFER NOT TO PRICE DISCRIMINATE VIA MIXED BUNDLING [J].
ANDERSON, SP ;
LERUTH, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1993, 11 (01) :49-61
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
[5]   Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency [J].
Bakos, Y ;
Brynjolfsson, E .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (12) :1613-1630
[6]  
Belleflamme Paul., 2015, Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies
[7]   Mixed Bundling of Two Independently Valued Goods [J].
Bhargava, Hemant K. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (09) :2170-2185
[8]   Mixed Bundling in Two-Sided Markets in the Presence of Installed Base Effects [J].
Chao, Yong ;
Derdenger, Timothy .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (08) :1904-1926
[9]   Optimal Software Free Trial Strategy: The Impact of Network Externalities and Consumer Uncertainty [J].
Cheng, Hsing Kenneth ;
Liu, Yipeng .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (02) :488-504
[10]   Free trial or no free trial: Optimal software product design with network effects [J].
Cheng, Hsing Kenneth ;
Tang, Qian Candy .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 205 (02) :437-447