Assessing the accuracy and efficiency of longwave radiative transfer models involving scattering effect with cloud optical property parameterizations

被引:11
作者
Kuo, Chia-Pang [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Ping [1 ]
Huang, Xianglei [3 ]
Chen, Yi-Hsuan [3 ]
Liu, Guosheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Climate & Space Sci & Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Radiative transfer; Water cloud parameterization; Ice cloud parameterization; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; MULTIPLE-SCATTERING; PART I; CIRRUS CLOUDS; CLIMATE MODEL; IMPACT; APPROXIMATION; CONFIGURATION; SIMULATIONS; ATMOSPHERES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106683
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
A radiative transfer model (RTM) that accurately and explicitly accounts for both absorbing and scattering effects requires a substantial amount of computational effort. In the longwave (LW) spectral regime, the atmosphere is optically opaque and absorbs a large portion of terrestrial thermal radiation. To alleviate the computational burden, clouds are assumed to be only absorptive in most general circulation models (GCMs) and their scattering effects are neglected. Using parameterizations of cloud bulk single-scattering properties derived from the latest cloud optical property models for satellite remote sensing, this study analyzes the numerical accuracy and efficiency of a variety of LW RTMs . The approaches considered in this study include the absorption approximation (AA), the absorption approximation with scattering parameterization (ASA), the two-stream approximation (2S), a hybrid two- and four-stream approximation (2/4S), and the discrete ordinate radiative transfer (DISORT) with multiple streams. These approximations are benchmarked against 128-stream DISORT calculation. After evaluating the full ranges of ice and water cloud optical and microphysical properties using these RTMs, we find that neglecting LW scattering effect causes simulation errors as large as +/- 15% by using the AA method. Among these RTMs. the 2/4S method provides an optimal balance between computational efficiency and accuracy, leading to the maximum cloud emissivity errors within +/- 5%, 25th to 75th percentile errors about +/- 1%, and almost zero net bias. Therefore, the 2/4S approximation is computationally accurate and yet affordable option for incorporating cloud longwave scattering effect into the radiation schemes used in weather and climate models. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations
    Anderson, JL
    Balaji, V
    Broccoli, AJ
    Cooke, WF
    Delworth, TL
    Dixon, KW
    Donner, LJ
    Dunne, KA
    Freidenreich, SM
    Garner, ST
    Gudgel, RG
    Gordon, CT
    Held, IM
    Hemler, RS
    Horowitz, LW
    Klein, SA
    Knutson, TR
    Kushner, PJ
    Langenhost, AR
    Lau, NC
    Liang, Z
    Malyshev, SL
    Milly, PCD
    Nath, MJ
    Ploshay, JJ
    Ramaswamy, V
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Shevliakova, E
    Sirutis, JJ
    Soden, BJ
    Stern, WF
    Thompson, LA
    Wilson, RJ
    Wittenberg, AT
    Wyman, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (24) : 4641 - 4673
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, DESCRIPTION NCAR COM
  • [3] Improved ice particle optical property simulations in the ultraviolet to far-infrared regime
    Bi, Lei
    Yang, Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2017, 189 : 228 - 237
  • [4] Accurate simulation of the optical properties of atmospheric ice crystals with the invariant imbedding T-matrix method
    Bi, Lei
    Yang, Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2014, 138 : 17 - 35
  • [5] Sensitivity of modeled far-IR radiation budgets in polar continents to treatments of snow surface and ice cloud radiative properties
    Chen, Xiuhong
    Huang, Xianglei
    Flanner, Mark G.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (18) : 6530 - 6537
  • [6] Parameterization for cloud longwave scattering for use in atmospheric models
    Chou, MD
    Lee, KT
    Tsay, SC
    Fu, Q
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1999, 12 (01) : 159 - 169
  • [7] Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes
    Clough, SA
    Shephard, MW
    Mlawer, E
    Delamere, JS
    Iacono, M
    Cady-Pereira, K
    Boukabara, S
    Brown, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2005, 91 (02) : 233 - 244
  • [8] An estimate of the global impact of multiple scattering by clouds on outgoing long-wave radiation
    Costa, S. M. S.
    Shine, K. P.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (616) : 885 - 895
  • [9] Investigating k distribution methods for parameterizing gaseous absorption in the Hadley Centre Climate Model
    Cusack, S
    Edwards, JM
    Crowther, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D2) : 2051 - 2057
  • [10] The Dynamical Core, Physical Parameterizations, and Basic Simulation Characteristics of the Atmospheric Component AM3 of the GFDL Global Coupled Model CM3
    Donner, Leo J.
    Wyman, Bruce L.
    Hemler, Richard S.
    Horowitz, Larry W.
    Ming, Yi
    Zhao, Ming
    Golaz, Jean-Christophe
    Ginoux, Paul
    Lin, S. -J.
    Schwarzkopf, M. Daniel
    Austin, John
    Alaka, Ghassan
    Cooke, William F.
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Freidenreich, Stuart M.
    Gordon, C. T.
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Held, Isaac M.
    Hurlin, William J.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    Knutson, Thomas R.
    Langenhorst, Amy R.
    Lee, Hyun-Chul
    Lin, Yanluan
    Magi, Brian I.
    Malyshev, Sergey L.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Naik, Vaishali
    Nath, Mary J.
    Pincus, Robert
    Ploshay, Jeffrey J.
    Ramaswamy, V.
    Seman, Charles J.
    Shevliakova, Elena
    Sirutis, Joseph J.
    Stern, William F.
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Wilson, R. John
    Winton, Michael
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Zeng, Fanrong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (13) : 3484 - 3519