Application value of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery

被引:11
|
作者
Tian, Min [1 ,4 ]
Fu, Huaping [1 ,4 ]
Du, Juan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, West China Sch Nursing, Dept VIP Gynecol Nursing, Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, West China Sch Nursing, Dept Radiat Therapy, 1416 Sect 1 Chenglong Ave, Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, West China Sch Nursing, Chemotherapy Gynecol Ctr Nursing, 1416 Sect 1 Chenglong Ave, Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH | 2021年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
Nutritional risk screening 2002; patient-generated subjective nutrition assessment; cervical cancer; surgery; nutritional assessment; MALNUTRITION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study explored and analyzed the application value of nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) and patient-generated subjective nutrition assessment (PG-SGA) in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery. Methods: A total of 165 cervical cancer patients that received elective cervical cancer surgery from February 2017 to December 2019 were chosen as the research subjects. NRS 2002 and PG-SGA were employed to evaluate the nutritional status of patients, and detect their nutrition-related laboratory examination indexes. By using albumin (ALB)<30 g/L as the criterion of malnutrition, the accuracy of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in evaluating the nutritional status of patients was analyzed. Results: The differences between scores of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in age, BMI, tumor stage, pelvic lymph node metastasis were statistically significant (P 0.05); while the difference between scores of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in different education degree, pathological type and growth type of patients was statistically insignificant (P 0.05). By using ALB<30 g/L as the gold standard to determine malnutrition, 64 malnourished patients were detected, with a detection rate of 38.79%. Compared with this gold standard, the judgment of NRS 2002 and PG-SGA have high consistency with the gold standard, and the Youden indexes were 0.550 and 0.795 respectively. In addition, the nutritional or malnutrition risk of cervical cancer patients was assessed by NRS2002 and PG-SGA, respectively. Among them, 33 patients received co-diagnosis, the results had remarkably correlation (P<0.05) with contingency coefficient r of 0.523. Conclusion: Both NRS2002 and PG-SGA are suitable for preoperative nutritional risk screening of patients with cervical cancer surgery. PG-SGA has a higher positive rate but poor time requirement than that of RS2002. Therefore, clinicians can choose the appropriate tool on the basis of an individual patient's situation for nutritional assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:7186 / 7192
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of NRS 2002 and PG-SGA for the assessment of nutritional status in cancer patients
    Yang, Jiajun
    Yuan, Kaitao
    Huang, Yubao
    Yu, Miao
    Huang, Xuejun
    Chen, Chao
    Fu, Jiyong
    Shi, Yingying
    Shi, Hanping
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2016, 27 (04): : 1178 - 1182
  • [2] Application of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for perioperative patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An observational study
    Tu, Yi
    Chen, Fengzhou
    Yu, Qing
    Song, Linglan
    Chen, Mengmeng
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (43)
  • [3] The PG-SGA outperforms the NRS 2002 for nutritional risk screening in cancer patients: a retrospective study from China
    Chen, Xinqiao
    Liu, Xiangliang
    Ji, Wei
    Zhao, Yixin
    He, Yuwei
    Liu, Yining
    Li, Qiguang
    Shi, Hanping
    Cui, Jiuwei
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [4] Prevalence of malnutrition comparing NRS2002, MUST, and PG-SGA with the GLIM criteria in adults with cancer: A multi-center study
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Wan, Zhong
    Zhu, Yu
    Zhang, Lijuan
    Zhang, Lili
    Wan, Hongwei
    NUTRITION, 2021, 83
  • [5] Preoperative Nutritional Assessment in Elderly Cancer Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: MNA or PG-SGA?
    Dubhashi, S. P.
    Kayal, Akshat
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S232 - S235
  • [6] Nutritional screening through patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in gynecological cancer
    dos Santos, Emylle Thais Melo
    Neris, Vanessa Alves
    da Silva, Tatiana Vanessa Nascimento
    Queiroz, Pedrita Mirella Albuquerque
    Maio, Regiane
    Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araujo
    MUNDO DA SAUDE, 2022, 46 : 54 - 63
  • [7] Differences in nutritional risk assessment between NRS2002, RFH-NPT and LDUST in cirrhotic patients
    Zhang, Peiyan
    Wang, Qi
    Zhu, Mengran
    Li, Pingping
    Wang, Yuzhen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for nutritional assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients
    Chonmaitree, Piyanant
    Sudcharoen, Asawin
    Poonyam, Piyakorn
    Laoarphasuwong, Nutthawut
    Khuancharee, Kitsarawut
    Thititagul, Ornicha
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2025, 33 (02)
  • [9] Comparison between GLIM and PG-SGA methods in the nutritional assessment of hospitalized oncological patients
    Solon, Lilian Andrade
    Gomes, Katia Priscila
    Da Luz, Marcella Campos Lima
    Tomiya, Marilia Tokiko Oliveira
    Campos, Samara Bomfim Gomes
    de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande
    REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 36
  • [10] PG-SGA SF in nutrition assessment and survival prediction for elderly patients with cancer
    Zhang, Qi
    Li, Xiang-Rui
    Zhang, Xi
    Ding, Jia-Shan
    Liu, Tong
    Qian, Liang
    Song, Meng-Meng
    Song, Chun-Hua
    Barazzoni, Rocco
    Tang, Meng
    Wang, Kun-Hua
    Xu, Hong-Xia
    Shi, Han-Ping
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)