Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value

被引:88
作者
Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg [1 ]
Huang, Kershen [2 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, McCallum Sch Business, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[2] Nova Southeastern Univ, Huizenga Coll Business & Entrepreneurship, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Institutional investors; Investment horizon; Short-termism; Long-term investing; INVESTORS; FIRM; ACTIVISM; PREFERENCES; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; REGRESSION; IMPACT; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A widely held view among policymakers, corporate executives and the media is that short-termism among institutional investors is increasingly prevalent. However, some institutional investors are increasingly vocal about taking a long-term approach, and these investors care about environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The reality is that investors are a diverse set of stakeholders with various objectives and time horizons. In the academic literature, empirical evidence on the relationship between institutional ownership horizon and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been mixed. In this paper, we show that institutions with longer (shorter) investment horizons promote (discourage) CSR at the firm level. In addition, the higher the proportion of long-term (short-term) investors, the higher (lower) the effect of CSR on long-term (short-term) buy-and-hold returns. These findings are consistent with the view that short-termism on the part of institutional investors places short-term pressure on companies, and therefore discourages long-term investments that create value.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 79
页数:19
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors
    Aggarwal, Reena
    Erel, Isil
    Ferreira, Miguel
    Matos, Pedro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 100 (01) : 154 - 181
  • [2] Innovation and Institutional Ownership
    Aghion, Philippe
    Van Reenen, John
    Zingales, Luigi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 277 - 304
  • [3] FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY
    ALTMAN, EI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) : 589 - 609
  • [4] Passive investors, not passive owners
    Appel, Ian R.
    Gormley, Todd A.
    Keim, Donald B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 121 (01) : 111 - 141
  • [5] Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility
    Barnett, Michael L.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) : 794 - 816
  • [6] Bebchuk LA, 2015, COLUMBIA LAW REV, V115, P1085
  • [7] Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership
    Bena, Jan
    Ferreira, Miguel A.
    Matos, Pedro
    Pires, Pedro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 126 (01) : 122 - 146
  • [8] Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Benabou, Roland
    Tirole, Jean
    [J]. ECONOMICA, 2010, 77 (305) : 1 - 19
  • [9] Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences
    Bennett, JA
    Sias, RW
    Starks, LT
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2003, 16 (04) : 1203 - 1238
  • [10] Do Institutional Investors Demand Public Disclosure?
    Bird, Andrew
    Karolyi, Stephen A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2016, 29 (12) : 3245 - 3277