Techno-environmental-economic assessment on municipal solid waste to methanol coupling with/without solid oxygen electrolysis cell unit

被引:23
作者
Sun, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yuting [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Chengfeng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yuchen [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Xiaoqian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Elect Power, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Efficient & Clean Energy U, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Municipal solid waste; Gasification; Solid oxygen electrolysis cell; Techno-environmental-economic assessment; Recycling; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; EXERGY ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; PROCESS SIMULATION; COAL-GASIFICATION; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; OXIDE ELECTROLYZER; PRODUCTION PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2022.03.060
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Integrating municipal solid waste (MSW) gasification with renewable energy to synthesize methanol shows great potential in alleviating the dependence on fossil energy and reducing the negative environmental impact of increasing MSW production. In this study, three technological processes including MSW-tomethanol integrated with carbon capture and storage (MTMC), MSW-to-methanol integrated with solid oxygen electrolysis cell unit (MTMS) and MSW incineration to power (MTP) are compared from the perspective of techno-environmental-economic performance. Results show that MTMS process owns the maximum exergy efficiency (60.8%), followed by MTMC (41.5%) and MTP (18.9%). In terms of global warming potential (GWP), MTP process has the worst environmental performance with 19,164.84 kgCO2eq/h. The economic analysis shows that MTMS process owns the highest value of levelized profit of MSW (LPOM) with 38.64 USD/t under the current market conditions. In addition, comparative analysis shows the production cost of methanol (PCOM) of MTMC and MTMS routes is 406.09 USD/t and 355.89 USD/t, respectively, which are economically competitive compared with the coal / biomass / CO2 hydrogenation to methanol route. Sensitivity analysis shows that MTMS process processes its advantage on economic performance only if the methanol price is higher than 350 USD/t and photovoltaic on-grid tariff is lower than 0.055 USD/kWh. (c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 627
页数:17
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Process simulation of a dual-stage Selexol unit for pre-combustion carbon capture at an IGCC power plant
    Ahn, Hyungwoong
    Kapetaki, Zoe
    Brandani, Pietro
    Brandani, Stefano
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 1751 - 1755
  • [2] Analysis and assessment of a hydrogen production plant consisting of coal gasification, thermochemical water decomposition and hydrogen compression systems
    Al-Zareer, Maan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 157 : 600 - 618
  • [3] Modeling a novel combined solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) - Biomass gasification renewable methanol production system
    Ali, Shahid
    Sorensen, Kim
    Nielsen, Mads P.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 154 (154) : 1025 - 1034
  • [4] A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products
    AlNouss, Ahmed
    McKay, Gordon
    Al-Ansari, Tareq
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 : 664 - 676
  • [5] Thermodynamic and electrochemical analyses of a solid oxide electrolyzer for hydrogen production
    AlZahrani, Abdullah A.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (33) : 21404 - 21413
  • [6] Ejector integration for the cost effective design of the Selexol™ process
    Ashrafi, Omid
    Bashiri, Hamed
    Esmaeili, Amin
    Sapoundjiev, Hristo
    Navarri, Philippe
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 162 : 380 - 392
  • [7] A Numerical investigation of municipal solid waste gasification using aspen plus
    Begum, Sharmina
    Rasul, M. G.
    Akbar, Delwar
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (ICME 2013), 2014, 90 : 710 - 717
  • [8] Performance Analysis of an Integrated Fixed Bed Gasifier Model for Different Biomass Feedstocks
    Begum, Sharmina
    Rasul, Mohammad G.
    Akbar, Delwar
    Ramzan, Naveed
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (12): : 6508 - 6524
  • [9] Bellotti Daria, 2019, E3S Web of Conferences, V113, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/201911301013
  • [10] Co-gasification of municipal solid waste and biomass in a commercial scale downdraft gasifier
    Bhoi, Prakashbhai R.
    Huhnke, Raymond L.
    Kumar, Ajay
    Indrawan, Natarianto
    Thapa, Sunil
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 163 : 513 - 518