Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature

被引:24
|
作者
DuBenske, Lori L. [1 ]
Schrager, Sarina B. [1 ]
Hitchcock, Mary E. [2 ]
Kane, Amanda K. [1 ]
Little, Terry A. [1 ]
McDowell, Helene E. [3 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Ebling Lib Hlth Sci, Madison, WI USA
[3] Hlth Decis Support Inc, Madison, WI USA
关键词
mammography; shared decision-making; breast cancer screening; patient-centered care; primary care; women's health; health communication; BREAST-CANCER; WOMEN; AID; COMMUNICATION; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; BENEFITS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
New guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for women and their clinician in consideration of breast cancer screening, particularly for women ages 35-50 where guidelines for routine mammography are controversial. A number of models offer general guidelines for SDM across clinical practice, yet they do not offer specific guidance about conducting SDM in mammography. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify the key elements of breast cancer screening SDM and synthesize these key elements for utilization by primary care clinicians. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus); PsycInfo, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and SocIndex databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were original studies from peer-reviewed publications (from 2009 or later) reporting breast cancer screening (mammography), medical decision-making, and patient-centered care. Study populations needed to include female patients 18+ years of age facing a real-life breast cancer screening decision. Article findings were specific to shared decision-making and/or use of a decision aid. Data extracted includes study design, population, setting, intervention, and critical findings related to breast cancer screening SDM elements. Scoping analysis includes descriptive analysis of study features and content analysis to identify the SDM key elements. Twenty-four articles were retained. Three thematic categories of key elements emerged from the extracted elements: information delivery/patient education (specific content and delivery modes), interpersonal clinician-patient communication (aspects of interpersonal relationship impacting SDM), and framework of the decision (sociocultural factors beyond direct SDM deliberation). A number of specific breast cancer screening SDM elements relevant to primary care clinical practice are delineated. The findings underscore the importance of the relationship between the patient and clinician and the necessity of spelling out each step in the SDM process. The clinician needs to be explicit in telling a woman that she has a choice about whether to get a mammogram and the benefits and harms of screening mammography. Finally, clinicians need to be aware of sociocultural factors that can influence their relationships and their patients' decision-making processes and attempt to identify and address these factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1814
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Framing the Clinical Encounter: Shared Decision-Making, Mammography Screening, and Decision Satisfaction
    Yang, Ellie F.
    Shah, Dhavan, V
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Little, Terry A.
    Garino, Natalie
    Campbell, Claire Elise
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2020, 25 (09) : 681 - 691
  • [42] Shared decision-making for children with medical complexity in community health services: a scoping review
    Jacobs, Sonja
    Davies, Nathan
    Butterick, Katherine L.
    Oswell, Jane L.
    Siapka, Konstantina
    Smith, Christina H.
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [43] Shared decision-making training embedded in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A scoping review
    Xiao, Lin
    Huang, Chongmei
    Bai, Yang
    Ding, Jinfeng
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 123
  • [44] Roles and competencies of nurses and physicians in shared decision-making in cardiac surgery: A scoping review
    van Dieen, Milou S. H.
    Paans, Wolter
    Mariani, Massimo A.
    Dieperink, Willem
    Blokzijl, Fredrike
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (01) : 60 - 72
  • [45] Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads
    Davis, Selena
    Roudsari, Abdul
    Raworth, Rebecca
    Courtney, Karen L.
    MacKay, Lee
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (04) : 857 - 866
  • [46] Shared decision-making with adults transitioning to long-term care: A scoping review
    Egan, Caroline
    Naughton, Corina
    Caples, Maria
    Mulcahy, Helen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OLDER PEOPLE NURSING, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [47] Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review br
    Rake, Ester A.
    Box, Ivana C. H.
    Dreesens, Dunja
    Meinders, Marjan J.
    Kremer, Jan A. M.
    Aarts, Johanna W. M.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (09) : 2860 - 2870
  • [48] Shared decision-making in post-coercion debriefing interventions in psychiatry - a scoping review
    Froelich, Katharina
    Schurmann, Jan
    Huber, Christian G.
    Trachsel, Manuel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [49] Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review
    Natalia Oprea
    Vittoria Ardito
    Oriana Ciani
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [50] Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review
    Oprea, Natalia
    Ardito, Vittoria
    Ciani, Oriana
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)