Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature

被引:24
|
作者
DuBenske, Lori L. [1 ]
Schrager, Sarina B. [1 ]
Hitchcock, Mary E. [2 ]
Kane, Amanda K. [1 ]
Little, Terry A. [1 ]
McDowell, Helene E. [3 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Ebling Lib Hlth Sci, Madison, WI USA
[3] Hlth Decis Support Inc, Madison, WI USA
关键词
mammography; shared decision-making; breast cancer screening; patient-centered care; primary care; women's health; health communication; BREAST-CANCER; WOMEN; AID; COMMUNICATION; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; BENEFITS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
New guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for women and their clinician in consideration of breast cancer screening, particularly for women ages 35-50 where guidelines for routine mammography are controversial. A number of models offer general guidelines for SDM across clinical practice, yet they do not offer specific guidance about conducting SDM in mammography. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify the key elements of breast cancer screening SDM and synthesize these key elements for utilization by primary care clinicians. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus); PsycInfo, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and SocIndex databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were original studies from peer-reviewed publications (from 2009 or later) reporting breast cancer screening (mammography), medical decision-making, and patient-centered care. Study populations needed to include female patients 18+ years of age facing a real-life breast cancer screening decision. Article findings were specific to shared decision-making and/or use of a decision aid. Data extracted includes study design, population, setting, intervention, and critical findings related to breast cancer screening SDM elements. Scoping analysis includes descriptive analysis of study features and content analysis to identify the SDM key elements. Twenty-four articles were retained. Three thematic categories of key elements emerged from the extracted elements: information delivery/patient education (specific content and delivery modes), interpersonal clinician-patient communication (aspects of interpersonal relationship impacting SDM), and framework of the decision (sociocultural factors beyond direct SDM deliberation). A number of specific breast cancer screening SDM elements relevant to primary care clinical practice are delineated. The findings underscore the importance of the relationship between the patient and clinician and the necessity of spelling out each step in the SDM process. The clinician needs to be explicit in telling a woman that she has a choice about whether to get a mammogram and the benefits and harms of screening mammography. Finally, clinicians need to be aware of sociocultural factors that can influence their relationships and their patients' decision-making processes and attempt to identify and address these factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1814
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: a scoping review
    Rake, Ester
    Box, Ivana
    Dreesens, Dunja
    Meinders, Marjan
    Kremer, Jan
    Aarts, Johanna
    Elwyn, Glyn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 109 : 97 - 97
  • [32] Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Li, Xuejing
    Meng, Meiqi
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Dan
    Fang, Jiaxin
    Wang, Junxin
    Han, Liu
    Hao, Yufang
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 2763 - 2781
  • [33] Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations
    Sobode, Oluwaseun Rebecca
    Jegan, Roshni
    Toelen, Jaan
    Dierickx, Kris
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 183 (10) : 4195 - 4203
  • [34] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Jordan R. Covvey
    Khalid M. Kamal
    Erin E. Gorse
    Zumi Mehta
    Trupti Dhumal
    Elham Heidari
    Deepika Rao
    Christopher Zacker
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1613 - 1637
  • [35] Shared decision-making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis
    Park, Eun Sook
    Cho, In Young
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2018, 32 (02) : 478 - 489
  • [36] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Covvey, Jordan R.
    Kamal, Khalid M.
    Gorse, Erin E.
    Mehta, Zumi
    Dhumal, Trupti
    Heidari, Elham
    Rao, Deepika
    Zacker, Christopher
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) : 1613 - 1637
  • [37] Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
    Rosca, Ana
    Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle
    Kasper, Juergen
    Rogger, Niek
    Drewniak, Daniel
    Krones, Tanja
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [38] Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
    Ana Rosca
    Isabelle Karzig-Roduner
    Jürgen Kasper
    Niek Rogger
    Daniel Drewniak
    Tanja Krones
    BMC Medical Ethics, 24
  • [39] A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
    Wieringa, Thomas H.
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    Montori, Victor M.
    de Wit, Maartje
    Smets, Ellen M. A.
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
    Snoek, Frank J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [40] A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
    Thomas H. Wieringa
    Marleen Kunneman
    Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez
    Victor M. Montori
    Maartje de Wit
    Ellen M. A. Smets
    Linda J. Schoonmade
    Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
    Frank J. Snoek
    Systematic Reviews, 6