Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature

被引:24
|
作者
DuBenske, Lori L. [1 ]
Schrager, Sarina B. [1 ]
Hitchcock, Mary E. [2 ]
Kane, Amanda K. [1 ]
Little, Terry A. [1 ]
McDowell, Helene E. [3 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Ebling Lib Hlth Sci, Madison, WI USA
[3] Hlth Decis Support Inc, Madison, WI USA
关键词
mammography; shared decision-making; breast cancer screening; patient-centered care; primary care; women's health; health communication; BREAST-CANCER; WOMEN; AID; COMMUNICATION; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; BENEFITS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
New guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for women and their clinician in consideration of breast cancer screening, particularly for women ages 35-50 where guidelines for routine mammography are controversial. A number of models offer general guidelines for SDM across clinical practice, yet they do not offer specific guidance about conducting SDM in mammography. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify the key elements of breast cancer screening SDM and synthesize these key elements for utilization by primary care clinicians. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus); PsycInfo, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and SocIndex databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were original studies from peer-reviewed publications (from 2009 or later) reporting breast cancer screening (mammography), medical decision-making, and patient-centered care. Study populations needed to include female patients 18+ years of age facing a real-life breast cancer screening decision. Article findings were specific to shared decision-making and/or use of a decision aid. Data extracted includes study design, population, setting, intervention, and critical findings related to breast cancer screening SDM elements. Scoping analysis includes descriptive analysis of study features and content analysis to identify the SDM key elements. Twenty-four articles were retained. Three thematic categories of key elements emerged from the extracted elements: information delivery/patient education (specific content and delivery modes), interpersonal clinician-patient communication (aspects of interpersonal relationship impacting SDM), and framework of the decision (sociocultural factors beyond direct SDM deliberation). A number of specific breast cancer screening SDM elements relevant to primary care clinical practice are delineated. The findings underscore the importance of the relationship between the patient and clinician and the necessity of spelling out each step in the SDM process. The clinician needs to be explicit in telling a woman that she has a choice about whether to get a mammogram and the benefits and harms of screening mammography. Finally, clinicians need to be aware of sociocultural factors that can influence their relationships and their patients' decision-making processes and attempt to identify and address these factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1814
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature
    Lori L. DuBenske
    Sarina B. Schrager
    Mary E. Hitchcock
    Amanda K. Kane
    Terry A. Little
    Helene E. McDowell
    Elizabeth S. Burnside
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1805 - 1814
  • [2] Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review
    Alba Corell
    Annie Guo
    Tomás Gómez Vecchio
    Anneli Ozanne
    Asgeir S. Jakola
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2021, 163 : 2371 - 2382
  • [3] Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review
    Corell, Alba
    Guo, Annie
    Vecchio, Tomas Gomez
    Ozanne, Anneli
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (09) : 2371 - 2382
  • [4] Shared Decision-Making in Dermatology A Scoping Review
    Morrison, Tessalyn
    Johnson, Jacob
    Baghoomian, Wenelia
    Hamilton, Andrew
    Simpson, Eric
    Greiling, Teri
    Foster, Erin
    JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 157 (03) : 330 - 337
  • [5] Do Shared Decision-Making Measures Reflect Key Elements of Shared Decision Making? A Content Review of Coding Schemes
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Henselmans, Inge
    Gartner, Fania R.
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (07) : 886 - 893
  • [6] Shared decision making in surgery: A scoping review of the literature
    Niburski, Kacper
    Guadagno, Elena
    Mohtashami, Sadaf
    Poenaru, Dan
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (05) : 1241 - 1249
  • [7] Shared responsibility for decision-making in NICU: A scoping review
    Pellikka, Hanna-Kaisa
    Axelin, Anna
    Sankilampi, Ulla
    Kangasniemi, Mari
    NURSING ETHICS, 2023, 30 (03) : 462 - 476
  • [8] SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN GENETIC COUNSELING: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Peng, Chenyang
    Ni, Ning
    Li, Yiyu
    Tan, Xiangmin
    Tu, Chaofeng
    Mei, Sun
    ACTA BIOETHICA, 2022, 28 (02) : 227 - 237
  • [9] Evaluation of the literature surrounding shared decision-making in elective rhinological surgery: A scoping review
    Karadaghy, Omar A.
    Vukas, Rachel R.
    Villwock, Jennifer A.
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2021, 48 (05) : 922 - 927
  • [10] Numeracy levels influence shared decision-making and surgical outcomes: A scoping review of the literature
    Congelosi, Peter D.
    Carroll, Matthew C.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 225 (06): : 967 - 974