Comparison of different ANN techniques in river flow prediction

被引:132
作者
Kisi, Ozgur
Cigizoglu, H. Kerem [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Istanbul, Fac Civil Engn, Hydraul Div, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Erciyes Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
feed-forward neural networks; radial basis function; generalized regression neural networks; continuous and intermittent river flow; prediction; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RAINFALL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/10286600600888565
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Forecasts of future events are required in many of the activities associated with the planning and operation of the components of a water resource system. For the hydrologic component, there is a need for both short- and long-term forecasts of river flow events in order to optimize the system or to plan for future expansion or reduction. This paper presents the comparison of different artificial neural network (ANN) techniques in short- and long-term continuous and intermittent daily streamflow forecasting. The studies in modelling the intermittent series are quite limited because of the complexity of fitting models in to these series. The available conventional models necessitate the adjustment of numerous parameters for calibration. Three different ANN techniques, namely, feed-forward back propagation (FFBP), generalized regression neural networks, and radial basis function-based neural networks (RBF) are applied to continuous and intermittent river flow data of two Turkish rivers for short-range and long-range forecasting studies. The k-fold partitioning method is employed for preparing the ANN training data successfully. In general, the forecasting performance of RBF is found to be superior to the other two ANN techniques and a time series model in terms of the selected performance criteria. It was observed that the FFBP method had some drawbacks such as a local minima problem and negative flow generation.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 231
页数:21
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Ali KM, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P173, DOI 10.1007/BF00058611
[2]   Suspended sediment load simulation by two artificial neural network methods using hydrometeorological data [J].
Alp, Murat ;
Cigizoglu, H. Kerem .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (01) :2-13
[3]   Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models [J].
Anctil, F ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (04) :357-368
[4]  
BEVAN KJ, 1995, COMPUTER MODELS WATE, P627
[5]   Performance of neural networks in daily streamflow forecasting [J].
Birikundavyi, S ;
Labib, R ;
Trung, HT ;
Rousselle, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2002, 7 (05) :392-398
[6]  
BROOMHEAD D, 2008, COMPLEX SYST, V2, P321
[7]   River flood forecasting with a neural network model [J].
Campolo, M ;
Andreussi, P ;
Soldati, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (04) :1191-1197
[8]  
Chow T.V., 1988, APPL HYDROLOGY
[9]   Application of generalized regression neural networks to intermittent flow forecasting and estimation [J].
Cigizoglu, HK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2005, 10 (04) :336-341
[10]   Generalized regression neural network in monthly flow forecasting [J].
Cigizoglu, HK .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 22 (02) :71-84