Review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Rating System Program

被引:18
作者
Sadiq, Abdul-Akeem [1 ]
Tyler, Jenna [1 ]
Noonan, Douglas S. [2 ,3 ]
Norton, Richard K. [4 ]
Cunniff, Shannon E. [5 ]
Czajkowski, Jeffrey [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Publ Adm, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, ONeill Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Philosophy Polit & Econ Program, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Taubman Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Environm Def Fund, Coastal Resilience, Washington, DC 20009 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Wharton Risk Management & Decis Proc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FLOOD MITIGATION; HAZARD MITIGATION; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; RISK PERCEPTIONS; IMPACT; RESILIENCE; DISASTERS; RECOVERY; FLORIDA; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000320
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study presents the first systematic literature review of academic research on the FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) program. The CRS is a voluntary program created in 1990 as a means to incentivize communities in the United States to implement floodplain management activities that surpass those required under the National Flood Insurance Program. As participating communities adopt additional flood mitigation measures, flood insurance policyholders in those communities receive reductions in their flood insurance premiums. To identify studies for inclusion, the authors searched three academic databases using the keywords "Community Rating System" and "Federal Emergency Management Agency" and "Community Rating System" and "FEMA." The search uncovered 44 studies that met the selection criteria (e.g., peer-reviewed, focus on CRS, and empirical) and are included in the review. The findings provide significant insights into the current state of research on the CRS. This paper concludes by providing some recommendations to policymakers aiming to enhance communities' resilience to floods and by outlining a future research agenda for the academic and practitioner communities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], HYDR INF CTR FLOOD L
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THESIS
[5]  
Asche E.A., 2013, The effect of flood risk on housing choices and community hazard mitigation
[6]  
Association of State Floodplain Managers, 2016, FLOODPL MAN 2016 LOC
[7]   Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States [J].
Berke, Philip ;
Cooper, John ;
Aminto, Meghan ;
Grabich, Shannon ;
Horney, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2014, 80 (04) :310-323
[8]   Impacts of Federal and State Hazard Mitigation Policies on Local Land Use Policy [J].
Berke, Philip R. ;
Lyles, Ward ;
Smith, Gavin .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (01) :60-76
[9]  
Blessing R, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000242, 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000242]
[10]   HAVE DISASTER LOSSES INCREASED DUE TO ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE? [J].
Bouwer, Laurens M. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 92 (01) :39-+