What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?

被引:15
作者
Lee, Minji [1 ]
Kim, Yun-Hee [1 ,2 ]
Im, Chang-Hwan [3 ]
Kim, Jung-Hoon [3 ]
Park, Chang-hyun [2 ]
Chang, Won Hyuk [2 ]
Lee, Ahee [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Ctr Prevent & Rehabil Heart Vasc & Stroke, Samsung Med Ctr,Sch Med, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul 133791, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Motor cortical excitability; Electric current density; STROKE; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.052
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) non-invasively modulates brain function by inducing neuronal excitability. The conventional hot spot for inducing the highest current density in the hand motor area may not be the optimal site for effective stimulation. In this study, we investigated the influence of the center position of the anodal electrode on changes in motor cortical excitability. We considered three tDCS conditions in 16 healthy subjects: (i) real stimulation with the anodal electrode located at the conventional hand motor hot spot determined by motor evoked potentials (MEPs); (ii) real stimulation with the anodal electrode located at the point with the highest current density in the hand motor area as determined by electric current simulation; and (iii) sham stimulation. Motor cortical excitability as measured by MEP amplitude increased after both real stimulation conditions, but not after sham stimulation. Stimulation using the simulation-derived anodal electrode position, which was found to be posterior to the MEP hot spot for all subjects, induced higher motor cortical excitability. Individual positioning of the anodal electrode, based on the consideration of anatomical differences between subjects, appears to be important for maximizing the effects of tDCS. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 350
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor deficit [J].
Ayache, Samar S. ;
Farhat, Wassim H. ;
Zouari, Hela G. ;
Hosseini, Hassan ;
Mylius, Veit ;
Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal .
EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2012, 12 (08) :949-972
[2]   A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression [J].
Bai, Siwei ;
Dokos, Socrates ;
Ho, Kerrie-Anne ;
Loo, Colleen .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 87 :332-344
[3]  
Bai Siwei, 2013, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, V41, P21
[4]   A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors [J].
Butler, Andrew J. ;
Shuster, Margaret ;
O'Hara, Erin ;
Hurley, Kevin ;
Middlebrooks, Dionne ;
Guilkey, Karen .
JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2013, 26 (02) :162-170
[5]   Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target [J].
Dmochowski, Jacek P. ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Su, Yuzhuo ;
Parra, Lucas C. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (04)
[6]  
Feng WW, 2013, TOP STROKE REHABIL, V20, P68, DOI 10.1310/tsr2001-68
[7]   Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning [J].
Foerster, Aguida ;
Rocha, Sergio ;
Wiesiolek, Carine ;
Chagas, Anna Paula ;
Machado, Giselle ;
Silva, Evelyn ;
Fregni, Felipe ;
Monte-Silva, Katia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 37 (05) :786-794
[8]   Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation [J].
Holdefer, RN ;
Sadleir, R ;
Russell, MJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (06) :1388-1397
[9]   Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be) [J].
Horvath, Jared C. ;
Carter, Olivia ;
Forte, Jason D. .
FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
[10]  
Jung YJ, 2013, BIOMED ENG LETT, V3, P39