Business Srategy and Overvaluation: Evidence from Korea

被引:4
作者
Cha, Sangkwon [1 ]
Hwang, Sunpil [2 ]
Kim, Yibae [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Grad Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hongik Univ, Grad Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Duksung Womens Univ, Dept Accounting, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS | 2019年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
Business Strategy; Overvaluation; Firm Specific Error; Firm Value; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; STRATEGY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; EQUITY;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.83
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to test the effect of business strategy on valuation error. Business strategy includes managerial decision making and managerial tendency. In previous research, there is a negative relationship between business strategy and accounting quality. In this study, we try to confirm whether strategy tendencies affected valuation errors. In order to confirm empirically between business strategy and overvaluation, we use 8,117 firms that between 2006 and 2017 and listed in KSE and KOSDAQ. We calculated business strategy which is introduced by Bentley, Omer, and Sharp (2013). We also used the overvaluation method introduced in Rhodes-Kropf, Robinson, and Viswanathan (2005). The results show that the more the leading business strategy is, the greater the value error becomes. In the case of dividing into leading and defensive companies, the lead firms showed a significant positive correlation with the valuation errors, while the defensive firms showed the negative relationship with overvaluation. This study examined the business strategy and the overvaluation. we confirmed whether the management strategy deepens the evaluation error caused by the firm characteristics. The results are meaningful that we extended the study on the quality of financial reporting of leading strategic firms.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains
    Aboody, D
    Lev, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (06) : 2747 - 2766
  • [2] The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view
    Barth, ME
    Beaver, WH
    Landsman, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2001, 31 (1-3) : 77 - 104
  • [3] Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort
    Bentley, Kathleen A.
    Omer, Thomas C.
    Sharp, Nathan Y.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2013, 30 (02) : 780 - 817
  • [4] Business Strategy, Internal Control over Financial Reporting, and Audit Reporting Quality
    Bentley-Goode, Kathleen A.
    Newton, Nathan J.
    Thompson, Anne M.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2017, 36 (04): : 49 - 69
  • [5] Chae A., 2019, J DISTRIBUTION SCI, V16, P77
  • [6] Business Strategy and Auditor Reporting
    Chen, Yu
    Eshleman, John Daniel
    Soileau, Jared S.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2017, 36 (02): : 63 - 86
  • [7] Overvaluation and earnings management
    Chi, Jianxin
    Gupta, Manu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2009, 33 (09) : 1652 - 1663
  • [8] Management forecasts and information asymmetry: An examination of bid-ask spreads
    Coller, M
    Yohn, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1997, 35 (02) : 181 - 191
  • [9] DECHOW PM, 1995, ACCOUNT REV, V70, P193
  • [10] Overvalued Equity and Financing Decisions
    Dong, Ming
    Hirshleifer, David
    Teoh, Siew Hong
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (12) : 3645 - 3683