Introducing the Endowment-Practice-Institutions (EPI) framework for studying agency in the institutional contestation of socio-technical regimes

被引:11
作者
Duygan, Mert [1 ,2 ]
Kachi, Aya [1 ]
Oliveira, Thiago D. [1 ]
Rinscheid, Adrian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Fac Business & Econ, Peter Merian Weg 6, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Eawag, Dept Environm Social Sci, Ueberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[3] Univ St Gallen, Inst Econ & Environm, Muller Friedberg Str 6-8, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Institutional work; Agency; Socio-technical regimes; Transitions; Destabilization; Coal; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION SYSTEMS; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; THEORIZING CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DESTABILIZATION; DESTRUCTION; DYNAMICS; POLITICS; POWER; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126396
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A timely transition of socio-technical systems to more sustainable alternatives is crucial in mitigating climate change and other environmental problems. While innovation plays a significant role in such transitions, policy makers and the scientific community have become increasingly aware that the deliberate destabilization of existing socio-technical regimes-including associated institutions and technologies-is also often necessary. However, such aspiration is politically contested. This paper presents the Endowment-Practice-Institutions (EPI) Framework to study the contestation of institutions underpinning socio-technical regimes. By integrating key theories from Institutional Sociology and Political Economy, the framework conceives actors' capability of influencing institutional structures to be dependent on their institutional work practices and the various endowments that enable these practices. We present Japanese coal policy as an example to illustrate how the framework can be used to assess actors' institutional work and their influence on institutional outcomes. In addition to providing new theoretical insights, the framework helps to systematically analyze agency-driven mechanisms pertinent for the maintenance or destabilization of socio-technical regimes. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and A Conceptual Synthesis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1949, TVA GRASS ROOTS STUD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 5 BAS EN STRAT
[4]  
Antal M., 2017, ENERGY POL, V101
[5]   Lessons from the past for sustainability transitions? A meta-analysis of socio-technical studies [J].
Arranz, Alfonso Martinez .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 44 :125-143
[6]   Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying [J].
Baumgartner, Frank R. ;
Larsen-Price, Heather A. ;
Leech, Beth L. ;
Rutledge, Paul .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2011, 64 (01) :3-16
[7]  
BEACH DEREK, 2019, Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
[8]   Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Carlsson, Bo ;
Lindmark, Sven ;
Rickne, Annika .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) :407-429
[9]   Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Hekkert, Marko ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Markard, Jochen ;
Sanden, Bjoern ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 16 :51-64
[10]   Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Berggren, Christian ;
Magnusson, Thomas ;
Hobday, Michael .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (6-7) :1210-1224