Enrichment-induced differences in methamphetamine drug discrimination in male rats

被引:3
作者
Chacho, Nicole M. [1 ]
Adams, Emily [1 ]
Stairs, Dustin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
Methamphetamine; Rats; Environmental enrichment; D1 dopamine receptor; Nicotine; Drug discrimination; ISOLATION-REARED RATS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; SENSATION-SEEKING; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS; DOPAMINE; COCAINE; AMPHETAMINE; MODULATION; ABUSE; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pbb.2019.02.008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rats raised in an enriched environment show a decrease in sensitivity to the subjective effects of the psychostimulant d-amphetamine. The purpose of the present study was to determine if environmental enrichment during development alters the subjective effects of the more commonly abused drug methamphetamine. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were raised in either an enriched (EC) or an isolated condition (IC). EC and IC rats were trained on a two-lever operant procedure to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg (i.p.) methamphetamine from saline. Following acquisition of the discrimination a methamphetamine generalization curve (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) was determined. The antagonistic effects of dopamine D-1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.0075-0.06 mg/kg) and the dopamine D-2 receptor antagonist eticlopride (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) were also tested. Finally, the ability of nicotine (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) to generalize and the ability of the nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (0.125-0.5 mg/kg) to antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine were determined. EC rats were less sensitive to discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine compared to IC rats at a low 0.3 mg/kg dose and showed full antagonism of methamphetamine discrimination following SCH23390 compared to IC rats. There were no environmentally-induced differences in the effects of eticlopride. Nicotine only partially generalized to the effects of methamphetamine in both EC and IC rats. While mecamylamine failed to antagonize the effects of methamphetamine in either EC or IC rats. These results suggest that environmental enrichment decreases sensitivity to the discriminative effects of methamphetamine and the differences may be mediated through changes in the D-1 dopamine receptor.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, BEHAV EXPRESSION BIO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, V8th
  • [3] Principles of drug abuse liability assessment in laboratory animals
    Ator, NA
    Griffiths, RR
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 70 (03) : S55 - S72
  • [4] AUTORADIOGRAPHIC LOCALIZATION OF DOPAMINE-D1 AND D2-RECEPTORS IN RAT NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS - RESISTANCE TO DIFFERENTIAL REARING CONDITIONS
    BARDO, MT
    HAMMER, RP
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 1991, 45 (02) : 281 - 290
  • [5] ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT ATTENUATES LOCOMOTOR SENSITIZATION, BUT NOT IN-VITRO DOPAMINE RELEASE, INDUCED BY AMPHETAMINE
    BARDO, MT
    BOWLING, SL
    ROWLETT, JK
    MANDERSCHEID, P
    BUXTON, ST
    DWOSKIN, LP
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1995, 51 (2-3) : 397 - 405
  • [6] Bardo MT, 2001, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V155, P278
  • [7] Nicotine drug discrimination and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in differentially reared rats
    Bockman, Charles S.
    Zeng, Wanyun
    Hall, Jamie
    Mittelstet, Beth
    Schwarzkopf, Liz
    Stairs, Dustin J.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 235 (05) : 1415 - 1426
  • [8] Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2018, BEH HLTH TRENDS US R
  • [9] Drug Discrimination in Methamphetamine-Trained Rats: Effects of Cholinergic Nicotinic Compounds
    Desai, Rajeev I.
    Bergman, Jack
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 335 (03) : 807 - 816
  • [10] IN A DRUG DISCRIMINATION PROCEDURE ISOLATION-REARED RATS GENERALIZE TO LOWER DOSES OF COCAINE AND AMPHETAMINE THAN RATS REARED IN AN ENRICHED ENVIRONMENT
    FOWLER, SC
    JOHNSON, JS
    KALLMAN, MJ
    LIOU, JR
    WILSON, MC
    HIKAL, AH
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 110 (1-2) : 115 - 118