Transarterial chemoembolization compared with conservative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: using a new classification

被引:92
作者
Niu, Zhi-Jie [2 ]
Ma, Yi-Long [1 ]
Kang, Ping [1 ]
Ou, Sheng-Qiu [1 ]
Meng, Zhi-Bin [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Kun [1 ]
Qi, Feng [1 ]
Zhao, Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tumor Hosp Guangxi Autonomous Reg, Nanning, Guangxi Provinc, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Postgrad, Nanning, Peoples R China
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Transarterial chemoembolization; Portal vein tumor thrombus classification; Prognosis; TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; SURVIVAL; EFFICACY; COMBINATION; MANAGEMENT; INVASION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-011-0145-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to compare the survival benefit of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with conservative treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), furthermore, to reveal which PVTT types benefit from TACE treatment. From August 2007 to January 2010, a prospective controlled study was performed on consecutive patients with advanced HCC and PVTT. Of a total of 150 patients, 115 were treated with TACE (lipiodol and anticancer agents +/- gelatin sponge embolization), and 35 who refused to accept the procedure were treated with conservative treatment. We performed survival analysis of the two treatment groups and then stratified by a new classification of PVTT that was divided into four types. Overall survival was significantly better in the TACE group than in the conservative group (8.67 months vs. 1.4 months, P < 0.001). The overall median survival for types I-IV PVTT were 12.0, 8.3, 5.0, and 2.43 months (P < 0.01). On subgroup analysis of PVTT, the median survival in the TACE group compared with conservative group for type I, II, III, and IV PVTT was 19.0 months versus 4.0 months, 11.0 months versus 1.43 months, 7.1 months versus 1.3 months, and 4.0 months versus 1.0 months, respectively (P < 0.01). The TACE group had significantly better survival than the conservative group for different extent of PVTT. TACE is an effective treatment mode compared with conservative treatment for HCC and PVTT and may provide a significantly better survival benefit for different extent of PVTT.
引用
收藏
页码:2992 / 2997
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Allgaier HP, 1998, INT J CANCER, V79, P601, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981218)79:6<601::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-F
[3]   Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.: Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M ;
Llovet, JM ;
Beaugrand, M ;
Lencioni, R ;
Burroughs, AK ;
Christensen, E ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Colombo, M ;
Rodés, J .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 35 (03) :421-430
[4]   Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Bruix, J ;
Llovet, JM .
HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) :519-524
[5]   A Meta-Analysis of Survival Rates of Untreated Patients in Randomized Clinical Trials of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Cabibbo, Giuseppe ;
Enea, Marco ;
Attanasio, Massimo ;
Bruix, Jordi ;
Craxi, Antonio ;
Camma, Calogero .
HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 51 (04) :1274-1283
[6]   Therapeutic Equivalence in Survival for Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization and Yttrium 90 Microsphere Treatments in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma A Two-Cohort Study [J].
Carr, Brian I. ;
Kondragunta, Venkateswarlu ;
Buch, Shama C. ;
Branch, Robert A. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (05) :1305-1314
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF PORTAL-VEIN INVASION AND ITS OUTCOME IN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA TREATED BY TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION [J].
CHEN, SC ;
HSIEH, MY ;
CHUANG, WL ;
WANG, LY ;
CHANG, WY .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 9 (01) :1-6
[8]  
Cheng Shu-qun, 2004, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, V84, P3
[9]  
Cheng SQ, 2007, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V54, P499
[10]   Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis [J].
Georgiades, CS ;
Hong, K ;
D'Angelo, M ;
Geschwind, JFH .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (12) :1653-1659