Modelling the Evolution of Economic Structure and Climate Change: A Review

被引:35
作者
Ciarli, Tommaso [1 ]
Savona, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, SPRU, Jubilee Bldg, Brighton BN1 9SL, E Sussex, England
关键词
Structural change; Climate change; Economic modelling; SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-MODELS; ECOLOGICAL MACROECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; MULTIAGENT MODEL; GROWTH; POLICY; ENERGY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We discuss how different models assessing climate change integrate aspects of structural change that are crucial to improve understanding of the relation between changes in the environment and in the economy. We identify six related aspects of structural change, which have significant impact on climate change: sectoral composition, industrial organisation, technology, employment, final demand, and institutions. Economic models vary substantially with respect to the aspects of structural change that they include, and how they model them. We review different modelling families and compare these differences: integrated assessment models (IAM), computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, structural change models (SCM), ecological macroeconomics models in the Keynesian tradition (EMK) and evolutionary agent based models (EABM). We find that IAM and CGE address few of the aspects of structural change identified; SCM focus on the sectoral composition; and EKM study final demand and employment structure. But all these models are aggregate and omit the complexity of the interactions between structural and climate change. EABM have explored a larger number of aspects of structural change, modelling their emergence from the interaction of microeconomic actors, but have not yet exploited their potential to study the interactions among interrelated aspects of structural and climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 64
页数:14
相关论文
共 157 条
[41]  
Cole H., 1973, Thinking About the Future - A Critique of the Limits to Growth
[42]   Do green jobs differ from non-green jobs in terms of skills and human capital? [J].
Consoli, Davide ;
Marin, Giovanni ;
Marzucchi, Alberto ;
Vona, Francesco .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (05) :1046-1060
[43]   MODELING COMPLEX ECOLOGICAL ECONOMIC-SYSTEMS - TOWARD AN EVOLUTIONARY, DYNAMIC UNDERSTANDING OF PEOPLE AND NATURE [J].
COSTANZA, R ;
WAINGER, L ;
FOLKE, C ;
MALER, KG .
BIOSCIENCE, 1993, 43 (08) :545-555
[44]   Endogenous growth and environmental policy: are the processes of growth and tertiarization in developed economies reversible? [J].
Desmarchelier, Benoit ;
Gallouj, Faiz .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2013, 23 (04) :831-860
[45]   The evolution of markets and the revolution of industry: a unified theory of growth [J].
Desmet, Klaus ;
Parente, Stephen L. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2012, 17 (03) :205-234
[46]  
Dierdorff Erich C., 2009, TECHNICAL REPORT
[47]   Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles [J].
Dosi, Giovanni ;
Fagiolo, Giorgio ;
Roventini, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2010, 34 (09) :1748-1767
[48]  
Durlauf StevenN., 2008, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, V2nd
[49]   Do the rich save more? [J].
Dynan, KE ;
Skinner, J ;
Zeldes, SP .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 112 (02) :397-444
[50]  
Enkvist P., 2007, Mckinsey Quarterly, P35