Evaluation of uterine ultrasound imaging in cervical radiotherapy; a comparison of autoscan and conventional probe

被引:0
作者
Baker, Mariwan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cooper, David T. [4 ]
Behrens, Claus F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Oncol, Radiotherapy Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Ctr Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Dept Elect Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Ctr Nucl Technol, Roskilde, Denmark
[4] Elekta Ltd, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; LOCALIZATION; PRESSURE; IMPACT; BRACHYTHERAPY; SEGMENTATION; VARIABILITY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20160510
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: In cervical radiotherapy, it is essential that the uterine position is correctly determined prior to treatment delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate an autoscan ultrasound (A-US) probe, a motorized transducer creating three-dimensional (3D) images by sweeping, by comparing it with a conventional ultrasound (C-US) probe, where manual scanning is required to acquire 3D images. Methods: Nine healthy volunteers were scanned by seven operators, using the Clarity (R) system (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). In total, 72 scans, 36 scans from the C-US and 36 scans from the A-US probes, were acquired. Two observers delineated the uterine structure, using the software-assisted segmentation in the Clarity workstation. The data of uterine volume, uterine centre of mass (COM) and maximum uterine lengths, in three orthogonal directions, were analyzed. Results: In 53% of the C-US scans, the whole uterus was captured, compared with 89% using the A-US. F-test on 36 scans demonstrated statistically significant differences in interobserver COM standard deviation (SD) when comparing the C-US with the A-US probe for the inferior-superior (p < 0.006), left-right (p < 0.012) and anteroposterior directions (p < 0.001). The median of the interobserver COM distance (Euclidean distance for 36 scans) was reduced from 8.5 (C-US) to 6.0mm (A-US). An F-test on the 36 scans showed strong significant differences (p < 0.001) in the SD of the Euclidean interobserver distance when comparing the C-US with the A-US scans. The average Dice coefficient when comparing the two observers was 0.67 (C-US) and 0.75 (A-US). The predictive interval demonstrated better interobserver delineation concordance using the A-US probe. Conclusion: The A-US probe imaging might be a better choice of image-guided radiotherapy system for correcting for daily uterine positional changes in cervical radiotherapy. Advances in knowledge: Using a novel A-US probe might reduce the uncertainty in interoperator variability during ultrasound scanning.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Online ultrasound image guidance for radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Impact of image acquisition on prostate displacement [J].
Artignan, X ;
Smitsmans, MHP ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Jaffray, DA ;
van Her, M ;
Bartelink, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02) :595-601
[2]  
Baker M, 2014, WOMENS HEALTH, V10, P583, DOI [10.2217/whe.14.49, 10.2217/WHE.14.49]
[3]   Inter-operator Variability in Defining Uterine Position Using Three-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging [J].
Baker, Mariwan ;
Jensen, Jorgen Arendt ;
Behrens, Claus F. .
2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2013, :840-843
[4]   Determining inter-fractional motion of the uterus using 3D ultrasound imaging during radiotherapy for cervical cancer [J].
Baker, Mariwan ;
Jensen, Jorgen Arendt ;
Behrens, Claus F. .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 9040
[5]   CERVIX REGRESSION AND MOTION DURING THE COURSE OF EXTERNAL BEAM CHEMORADIATION FOR CERVICAL CANCER [J].
Beadle, Beth M. ;
Jhingran, Anuja ;
Salehpour, Mohammad ;
Sam, Marianne ;
Iyer, Revathy B. ;
Eifel, Patricia I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (01) :235-241
[6]   Inter- and intrafractional tumor and organ movement in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A cinematic-MRI point-of-interest study [J].
Chan, Philip ;
Dinniwell, Robert ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cho, Young-Bin ;
Jaffray, David ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Levin, Wilfred ;
Manchul, Lee ;
Fyles, Anthony ;
Milosevic, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (05) :1507-1515
[7]   Ultrasound-based image guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer - Comparison of cross-modality and intramodality methods for daily localization during external beam radiotherapy [J].
Cury, Fabio L. B. ;
Shenouda, George ;
Souhami, Luis ;
Duclos, Marie ;
Faria, Sergio L. ;
David, Marc ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Corns, Robert ;
Falco, Tony .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (05) :1562-1567
[8]  
Ding M, 2003, P SPIE INT SOC OPTIC
[9]   Fast prostate segmentation in 3D TRUS images based on continuity constraint using an autoregressive model [J].
Ding, Mingyue ;
Chiu, Bernard ;
Gyacskov, Igor ;
Yuan, Xiaping ;
Drangova, Maria ;
Downey, Donal B. ;
Fenster, Aaron .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (11) :4109-4125
[10]   Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy [J].
Fargier-Voiron, Marie ;
Presles, Benoit ;
Pommier, Pascal ;
Rit, Simon ;
Munoz, Alexandre ;
Liebgott, Herve ;
Sarrut, David ;
Biston, Marie-Claude .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (01) :132-137