Why Do People under Community Supervision Work and Earn So Little? And What Can Policy Do to Increase Their Employment and Earnings?

被引:2
|
作者
Holzer, Harry J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, McCourt Sch Publ Policy, Publ Policy, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Brookings Inst, Econ Studies, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Amer Inst Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[4] US Dept Labor, Washington, DC 20210 USA
[5] Georgetown Ctr Poverty & Inequal, Washington, DC USA
关键词
parole and probation; returning citizens; employment and earnings; earnings; recidivism; LABOR-MARKET OUTCOMES; BAN; BOX;
D O I
10.1177/00027162221109992
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this article, I review what we know about the impacts of felony convictions and incarceration on later employment and earnings, particularly for those under community supervision. I then discuss what employers and public policymakers can do to improve these outcomes. First, I review the basic empirical facts on the employment and earnings of returning citizens, various hypotheses that could explain these facts, and the available evidence that support those hypotheses. Second, I review why people under community supervision may have either similar or different employment outcomes from those of returning citizens more broadly. Third, I consider the perspectives of employers and why it might be in their interests to reduce hiring penalties associated with earlier incarceration (especially in tight labor markets). Fourth, I consider what we know about policies to reduce these penalties and improve outcomes. In sum, I argue that both moral and economic arguments exist for a general reduction of hiring penalties that would improve employment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 60
页数:15
相关论文
共 2 条