Influence of time of rejection on long-term graft survival in renal transplantation

被引:108
作者
Opelz, Gerhard [1 ]
Doehler, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Immunol, Dept Transplantat Immunol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
time of rejection; long-term survival; renal transplantation;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181661695
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the relationship of acute rejection episodes (ARE) at different times posttransplantation with reversibility of graft dysfunction and long-term graft failure using data from the Collaborative Transplant Study database. Methods. A total of 28,867 patients receiving their graft between 1995 and 2005 from deceased donors were included in the analysis. The time from renal transplantation to first treated ARE was divided into intervals up to 3 years. Long-term graft survival and half-life rates were calculated and hazard ratios (HR) for failure were computed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results. Compared with patients who did not receive rejection treatment during the first posttransplant year, HR for graft survival increased to 1.35 for patients with rejection 0 to 90 days (P<0.001), 2.05 with rejection 91 to 180 days (P<0.001), and 2.74 with rejection 181 to 365 days of posttransplantion (P<0.001). First rejections occurring during the second year were associated with HR 3.35 (P<0.001) and rejections during the third year with HR 3.17 (P<0.001). in addition to the time of rejection, the degree of functional recovery after rejection treatment was found to be important for subsequent graft survival. Conclusion. The time point of occurrence and the degree of functional recovery after rejection treatment were found to significantly influence the impact of ARE on long-term graft survival, and we were able to quantify the associated risks.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 666
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome [J].
Bates, WD ;
Davies, DR ;
Welsh, K ;
Gray, DWR ;
Fuggle, SV ;
Morris, PJ .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 14 (10) :2364-2369
[2]   Chronic renal allograft dysfunction [J].
Chapman, JR ;
O'Connell, PJ ;
Nankivell, BJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (10) :3015-3026
[3]  
COLLETT D, 1994, MODELLING SURVIVAL D, P116
[4]   Impact of acute rejection and early allograft function on renal allograft survival [J].
Cosio, FG ;
Pelletier, RP ;
Falkenhain, ME ;
Henry, ML ;
Elkhammas, EA ;
Davies, EA ;
Bumgardner, GL ;
Ferguson, RM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (11) :1611-1615
[5]   Why do kidney grafts fail?: A long-term single-center experience [J].
Dickenmann, MJ ;
Nickeleit, V ;
Tsinalis, D ;
Gürke, L ;
Mihatsch, MJ ;
Thiel, G .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 15 (9-10) :508-514
[6]   International variation in histologic grading is large, and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility [J].
Furness, PN ;
Taub, N ;
Assmann, KJM ;
Banfi, G ;
Cosyns, JP ;
Dorman, AM ;
Hill, CM ;
Kapper, SK ;
Waldherr, R ;
Laurinavicius, A ;
Marcussen, N ;
Martins, AP ;
Nogueira, M ;
Regele, H ;
Seron, D ;
Carrera, M ;
Sund, S ;
Taskinen, EI ;
Paavonen, T ;
Tihomirova, T ;
Rosenthal, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (06) :805-810
[7]   International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: Report of the CERTPAP Project [J].
Furness, PN ;
Taub, N .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 60 (05) :1998-2012
[8]   Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. [J].
Hariharan, S ;
Johnson, CP ;
Bresnahan, BA ;
Taranto, SE ;
McIntosh, MJ ;
Stablein, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (09) :605-612
[9]   Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival [J].
Hariharan, S ;
McBride, MA ;
Cherikh, WS ;
Tolleris, CB ;
Bresnahan, BA ;
Johnson, CP .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 62 (01) :311-318
[10]  
Heaf J G, 1998, Transpl Int, V11 Suppl 1, pS26, DOI 10.1007/s001470050419