Numerical and experimental analysis of optimal nozzle dimensions for FDM printers

被引:14
作者
Hira, Onur [1 ]
Yucedag, Senem [2 ]
Samankan, Shahrad [1 ]
Cicek, Ovgu Yagiz [3 ]
Altinkaynak, Atakan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Mech Engn Dept, TR-34437 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Met & Mat Engn Dept, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] CAVO Otomot Tic & San AS, TR-41420 Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
Fused deposition modeling (FDM); Finite-element method (FEM); Level set method; Optimization; Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS); Polylactic acid (PLA); Co-polyester (CPE); GEOMETRY; FLOW;
D O I
10.1007/s40964-021-00241-y
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study aims to optimize the nozzle channel geometry and manufacturing parameters to obtain polymer parts with the required dimensional accuracy. For this purpose, samples with 30 strips were printed with an FDM printer. Each strip was measured at 4000 points using image processing method. To investigate the effect of the manufacturing parameters, a linear regression model was created based on the experimental data. The numerical model was created and validated comparing with the experimental results, and optimum nozzle channel geometry was obtained using the validated numerical model. Nozzles with the optimal channel geometries were manufactured and new samples were printed for comparison. Based on the experimental results, the strip width increased along the printing direction and ABS showed more swelling than PLA and CPE. The effects of feed rate, temperature, and measurement position on strip widths were evident for all materials. The results showed that the anticipated strip widths can be obtained for all materials using the optimized nozzle channel geometries. Thus, the dimensional accuracy of the 3D-printed parts can be improved using the optimized nozzles.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 838
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Dimensional accuracy of FDM-printed polymer parts [J].
Akbas, Oguzhan Emre ;
Hira, Onur ;
Hervan, Sahar Zhiani ;
Samankan, Shahrad ;
Altinkaynak, Atakan .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (02) :288-298
[2]   Melting in a Single Screw Extruder: Experiments and 3D Finite Element Simulations [J].
Altinkaynak, A. ;
Gupta, M. ;
Spalding, M. A. ;
Crabtree, S. L. .
INTERNATIONAL POLYMER PROCESSING, 2011, 26 (02) :182-196
[3]  
Axtell, 1989, THESIS U TECHNOLOGY
[4]   Liquefier dynamics in fused deposition [J].
Bellini, A ;
Güçeri, S ;
Bertoldi, M .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (02) :237-246
[5]  
Bellini A., 2002, FUSED DEPOSITION CER
[6]  
Buj-Corral Irene, 2019, Procedia Manufacturing, V41, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.011
[7]   Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process [J].
Chang, Dar-Yuan ;
Huang, Bao-Han .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 53 (9-12) :1027-1037
[8]   Numerical and experimental analysis of optimal nozzle dimensions for FDM printers [J].
Hira, Onur ;
Yucedag, Senem ;
Samankan, Shahrad ;
Cicek, Ovgu Yagiz ;
Altinkaynak, Atakan .
PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 7 (05) :823-838
[9]   Motion planning and numerical simulation of material deposition at corners in extrusion additive manufacturing [J].
Comminal, Raphael ;
Serdeczny, Marcin P. ;
Pedersen, David B. ;
Spangenberg, Jon .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 29
[10]   Numerical modeling of the strand deposition flow in extrusion-based additive manufacturing [J].
Comminal, Raphael ;
Serdeczny, Marcin P. ;
Pedersen, David B. ;
Spangenberg, Jon .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 20 :68-76