Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Van Ryckeghem, Florence [1 ,2 ]
Haverbeke, Chloe [2 ]
Wynendaele, Wim [3 ]
Jerusalem, Guy [4 ,5 ]
Somers, Luc [6 ]
Van den Broeck, Anke [7 ]
Vingerhoedt, Sofie [7 ]
Van Belle, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] AZ Glorieux, Ronse, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Imelda Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Bonheiden, Belgium
[4] CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium
[5] Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium
[6] OncoLogX, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] Amgen Inc, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Prophylaxis; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; DOSE-DENSE CHEMOTHERAPY; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DAILY FILGRASTIM; PHASE-III; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4399-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo prevent febrile neutropenia (FN), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (PPG) for patients at high risk (20%) of FN. In Belgium, the use of PPG is restricted by specific reimbursement criteria. The impact of these criteria on PPG use and adherence to guidelines is unknown.MethodsThis multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study aimed to describe PPG use by FN risk category in breast cancer patients who were scheduled to receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy in outpatient clinics in Belgium during a 2-week period between 13 October and 12 December 2014.ResultsIn total, 490 patients were enrolled. Median age was 57.0years. Based on their chemotherapy regimen, 53.9, 5.1 and 41.0% of patients were at a low, intermediate and high risk of FN, respectively. Overall, 39.8% of patients received PPG (17.0, 12.0 and 73.1% of those receiving low-, intermediate- and high-risk regimens, respectively). In the high-risk category, PPG was used in 89.9% of dose-dense and in 25.0% of classical chemotherapy regimens. PPG use was adherent to EORTC guidelines in 75.3% of patients (30.6% appropriate use, 44.7% appropriate non-use). EORTC guidelines would recommend PPG use in 46.1% of this study population (n=226), and its use was reimbursable in Belgium in 76.1% of these patients (n=172), but only 66.4% of them received PPG (n=150).ConclusionsBoth Belgian reimbursement criteria and physician decision-making led to a proportion of patients for whom PPG treatment was recommended but finally not receiving it.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1108
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients: a retrospective study
    Takumi Sakurada
    Sanako Bando
    Yoshito Zamami
    Kenshi Takechi
    Masayuki Chuma
    Mitsuhiro Goda
    Yasushi Kirino
    Toshimi Nakamura
    Kazuhiko Teraoka
    Masami Morimoto
    Akira Tangoku
    Keisuke Ishizawa
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2019, 84 : 1107 - 1114
  • [22] The impact of new European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines on the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the management of breast cancer patients
    Zielinski, Christoph C.
    Awada, Ahmad
    Cameron, David A.
    Cufer, Tanja
    Martin, Miguel
    Aapro, Matti
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (03) : 353 - 365
  • [23] Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Schenfeld, Jennifer
    Gong, TingTing
    Henry, David
    Kelsh, Michael
    Gawade, Prasad
    Peng, Yi
    Bradbury, Brian D.
    Li, Shuling
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (07) : 6327 - 6338
  • [24] Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Kimura, Yuri
    Sasada, Shinsuke
    Emi, Akiko
    Masumoto, Norio
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Okada, Morihito
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (07) : 3507 - 3512
  • [25] Evaluation of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for epithelial ovarian cancer
    Matsui, K.
    Mori, T.
    Sawada, M.
    Kuroboshi, H.
    Tatsumi, H.
    Yoshioka, T.
    Akiyama, M.
    Yamamoto, T.
    Iwasaku, K.
    Kitawaki, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01) : 48 - 51
  • [26] The prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled study
    Li, Lei
    Ma, Shuiqing
    Wu, Ming
    Tan, Xianjie
    Zhong, Sen
    Lang, Jinghe
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (04) : 373 - 380
  • [27] Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy-findings from clinical practice
    Krzemieniecki, K.
    Sevelda, P.
    Erdkamp, F.
    Smakal, M.
    Schwenkglenks, M.
    Puertas, J.
    Trojan, A.
    Szabo, Z.
    Bendall, K.
    Maenpaa, J.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (03) : 667 - 677
  • [28] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) patterns of use in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Choi, Mi Rim
    Solid, Craig A.
    Chia, Victoria M.
    Blaes, Anne H.
    Page, John H.
    Barron, Richard
    Arneson, Thomas J.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (06) : 1619 - 1628
  • [29] Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review
    Mitchell, Sarah
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Woods, Matthew
    Garcia, Jacob
    Hebard-Massey, Kerri
    Barron, Rich
    Samuel, Miny
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (05) : 702 - 716
  • [30] Predictors of response of patients with solid tumors to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
    Ohnaka, Hiroaki
    Tsukamoto, Hitoshi
    Nakamura, Toshiaki
    Yano, Ryoichi
    Watanabe, Kyohei
    Igarashi, Toshiaki
    Goto, Nobuyuki
    Masada, Mikio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2013, 35 (01) : 45 - 50