Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Van Ryckeghem, Florence [1 ,2 ]
Haverbeke, Chloe [2 ]
Wynendaele, Wim [3 ]
Jerusalem, Guy [4 ,5 ]
Somers, Luc [6 ]
Van den Broeck, Anke [7 ]
Vingerhoedt, Sofie [7 ]
Van Belle, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] AZ Glorieux, Ronse, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Imelda Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Bonheiden, Belgium
[4] CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium
[5] Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium
[6] OncoLogX, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] Amgen Inc, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Prophylaxis; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; DOSE-DENSE CHEMOTHERAPY; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DAILY FILGRASTIM; PHASE-III; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4399-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo prevent febrile neutropenia (FN), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (PPG) for patients at high risk (20%) of FN. In Belgium, the use of PPG is restricted by specific reimbursement criteria. The impact of these criteria on PPG use and adherence to guidelines is unknown.MethodsThis multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study aimed to describe PPG use by FN risk category in breast cancer patients who were scheduled to receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy in outpatient clinics in Belgium during a 2-week period between 13 October and 12 December 2014.ResultsIn total, 490 patients were enrolled. Median age was 57.0years. Based on their chemotherapy regimen, 53.9, 5.1 and 41.0% of patients were at a low, intermediate and high risk of FN, respectively. Overall, 39.8% of patients received PPG (17.0, 12.0 and 73.1% of those receiving low-, intermediate- and high-risk regimens, respectively). In the high-risk category, PPG was used in 89.9% of dose-dense and in 25.0% of classical chemotherapy regimens. PPG use was adherent to EORTC guidelines in 75.3% of patients (30.6% appropriate use, 44.7% appropriate non-use). EORTC guidelines would recommend PPG use in 46.1% of this study population (n=226), and its use was reimbursable in Belgium in 76.1% of these patients (n=172), but only 66.4% of them received PPG (n=150).ConclusionsBoth Belgian reimbursement criteria and physician decision-making led to a proportion of patients for whom PPG treatment was recommended but finally not receiving it.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1108
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
    Florence Van Ryckeghem
    Chloë Haverbeke
    Wim Wynendaele
    Guy Jerusalem
    Luc Somers
    Anke Van den broeck
    Sofie Vingerhoedt
    Simon Van Belle
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1099 - 1108
  • [2] Real-World Use of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor in Patients with Breast Cancer from Alberta, Canada
    Ding, Philip Q.
    Newcomer, Brandt J.
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [3] Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level
    Baig, Hassam
    Somlo, Barbara
    Eisen, Melissa
    Stryker, Scott
    Bensink, Mark
    Morrow, Phuong K.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (07) : 1576 - 1585
  • [4] Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Gawade, Prasad L.
    Li, Shuling
    Henry, David
    Smith, Nancy
    Belani, Rajesh
    Kelsh, Michael A.
    Bradbury, Brian D.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (09) : 4413 - 4424
  • [5] Real-world impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia
    Altwairgi, A. K.
    Hopman, W. M.
    Mates, M.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : E171 - E179
  • [6] Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
    Hsu, Shu-Wei
    Chiang, Shao-Chin
    Hsu, Jason C. C.
    Ko, Yu
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [7] Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain - results of the LEARN Study
    Almenar, D.
    Mayans, J.
    Juan, O.
    Garcia, Bueno J. M.
    Jalon, Lopez J., I
    Frau, A.
    Guinot, M.
    Cerezuela, P.
    Garcia, Buscalla E.
    Gasquet, J. A.
    Sanchez, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2009, 18 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer in the United Kingdom
    Whyte, Sophie
    Cooper, Katy L.
    Stevenson, Matt D.
    Madan, Jason
    Akehurst, Ron
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 465 - 474
  • [9] Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients: a retrospective study
    Sakurada, Takumi
    Bando, Sanako
    Zamami, Yoshito
    Takechi, Kenshi
    Chuma, Masayuki
    Goda, Mitsuhiro
    Kirino, Yasushi
    Nakamura, Toshimi
    Teraoka, Kazuhiko
    Morimoto, Masami
    Tangoku, Akira
    Ishizawa, Keisuke
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 84 (05) : 1107 - 1114
  • [10] Discrete Choice Experiment to Estimate Breast Cancer Patients' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors
    Johnson, Phaedra
    Bancroft, Tim
    Barron, Richard
    Legg, Jason
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Watson, Holly
    Naeim, Arash
    Watkins, Angela
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (04) : 380 - 389