Single-level awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a Mayo Clinic institutional experience and national analysis

被引:9
作者
Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley [1 ]
Ghaith, Abdul Karim [2 ,3 ]
Bhandarkar, Archis R. [2 ,3 ]
De Biase, Gaetano [1 ]
Rajjoub, Rami [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Selby G. [1 ]
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo [1 ]
Bydon, Mohamad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Jacksonville, FL USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Rochester, MI USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Neuroinformat Lab, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
awake; anesthesia; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF; spine; TLIF;
D O I
10.3171/2021.9.FOCUS21457
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a novel technique for performing spinal fusions in patients under conscious sedation. Whether awake TLIF can reduce operative times and decrease the hospital length of stay (LOS) remains to be shown. In this study, the authors sought to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent awake TLIF and those who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia by using institutional experience at the Mayo Clinic and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS Chart review was performed for a consecutive series of patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-TLIF performed by a single surgeon (K.A.I.) at a single institution. Additionally, the NSQIP database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for patients who underwent awake TLIF as well as propensity score- matched patients who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia. RESULTS A total of 20 patients at Mayo Clinic underwent awake single-level MIS-TLIF. The mean operative time was 122 +/- 16.68 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 39 +/- 30.24 ml. No intraoperative complications were reported. A total of 96 patients who underwent TLIF (24 awake and 72 under general anesthesia) were analyzed from the NSQIP database. The mean LOS was less in the awake cohort (1.4 +/- 1.381 days) than the general anesthesia cohort (3 +/- 2.274 days) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Evidence from the authors' institutional experience and national analysis has demonstrated that awake MIS-TLIF is efficient and can reduce hospital LOS.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] A novel technique for awake, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Choy, Winward
    Miller, Catherine A.
    Robinson, Leslie C.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (04)
  • [2] Awake Robotic Minimally Invasive L4-5 Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Chen, Selby
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 148 : 93 - 93
  • [3] Awake minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a pedicle-based retraction system
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Bechtle, Perry
    Leone, Bruce
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 200
  • [4] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) : 1712 - 1721
  • [5] Minimally invasive lumbar fusion
    Foley, KT
    Holly, LT
    Schwender, JD
    [J]. SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) : S26 - S35
  • [6] Thirty-Day Readmission Risk Factors Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for 4992 Patients From the ACS-NSQIP Database
    Garcia, Roxanna M.
    Khanna, Ryan
    Dahdaleh, Nader S.
    Cybulski, George
    Lam, Sandi
    Smith, Zachary A.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (03) : 220 - 226
  • [7] Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF
    Ge, David H.
    Stekas, Nicholas D.
    Varlotta, Christopher G.
    Fischer, Charla R.
    Petrizzo, Anthony
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Passias, Peter G.
    Errico, Thomas J.
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    [J]. SPINE, 2019, 44 (09) : E555 - E560
  • [8] Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis
    Hammad, Ahmed
    Wirries, Andre
    Ardeshiri, Ardavan
    Nikiforov, Olexandr
    Geiger, Florian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [9] Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Arthroscopy
    Kim, Ju-Eun
    Choi, Dae-Jung
    [J]. CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (02) : 248 - 252
  • [10] Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: technical innovations and outcomes
    Kolcun, John Paul G.
    Brusko, G. Damian
    Wang, Michael Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7