Control of Tamarix in the Western United States:: Implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration

被引:229
作者
Shafroth, PB [1 ]
Cleverly, JR
Dudley, TL
Taylor, JP
Van Riper, C
Weeks, EP
Stuart, JN
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Ft Collins Sci Ctr, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Nat Resource & Environm Sci, Reno, NV 89512 USA
[4] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Bosque Apache Natl Wildlife Refuge, Socorro, NM 87801 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, SW Biol Sci Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Natl Res Program, Lakewood, CO 80225 USA
[7] New Mexico Dept Game & Fish, Conservat Serv Div, Santa Fe, NM 87504 USA
关键词
Tamarix; saltcedar; tamarisk; evapotranspiration; water salvage; wildlife use; riparian restoration; revegetation; invasive species; exotic species; control;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-004-0099-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-native shrub species in the genus Tamarix (saltcedar, tamarisk) have colonized hundreds of thousands of hectares of floodplains, reservoir margins, and other wetlands in western North America. Many resource managers seek to reduce saItcedar abundance and control its spread to increase the flow of water in streams that might otherwise be lost to evapotranspiration, to restore native riparian (streamside) vegetation, and to improve wildlife habitat. However, increased water yield might not always occur and has been substantially lower than expected in water salvage experiments, the potential for successful revegetation is variable, and not all wildlife taxa clearly prefer native plant habitats over saItcedar. As a result, there is considerable debate surrounding saItcedar control efforts. We review the literature on saItcedar control, water use, wildlife use, and riparian restoration to provide resource managers, researchers, and policy-makers with a balanced summary of the state of the science. To best ensure that the desired outcomes of removal programs are met, scientists and resource managers should use existing information and methodologies to carefully select and prioritize sites for removal, apply the most appropriate and cost-effective control methods, and then rigorously monitor control efficacy, revegetation success, water yield changes, and wildlife use.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 246
页数:16
相关论文
共 162 条
  • [1] Andersen DC, 1999, REGUL RIVER, V15, P377, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199909/10)15:5&lt
  • [2] 377::AID-RRR549&gt
  • [3] 3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-Q
  • [5] ANDERSON B, 1998, RESTORATION MANAGEME, V16, P130
  • [6] Anderson BW, 1977, IMPORTANCE PRESERVAT, P128
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1996, HYDR HDB
  • [8] [Anonymous], THESIS SAN DIEGO STA
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1974, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2004, Riparian Revegetation: An Account of Two Decades of Experience in the Arid Southwest