What determines household cooking fuel preferences? Empirical evidence from South Korea

被引:1
作者
Lee, Chan Hee [1 ]
Hong, Jong Ho [1 ]
Kang, Sung Hoon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Policy Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Dept Policy Studies, 509 Multidisciplinary Lect Hall,Wangsimni Ro 222, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
Fuel-switching; energy choice; electric stove; electrification; energy ladder; energy stacking; RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS; ENERGY CHOICE; LUNG-FUNCTION; GAS; SUBSTITUTION; ASSOCIATION; CONSUMPTION; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X221139925
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the determinants of modern cooking fuel choices in Korea. The ordered probit model is estimated using an extensive online survey of Korean household energy consumers. Our empirical results showed that age, gender, and education are significant determinants of modern cooking fuel choices among the socioeconomic demographic variables: females, older people, and highly educated people are more likely to prefer electricity. Also, electricity is more likely to be preferred over natural gas by people who have a higher preference for district heating. Two psychological factors significantly influence cooking fuel choices. People whose behaviors are environment-friendly and people who are more health-conscious are more likely to prefer electricity over natural gas or propane. There are three important insights into the cooking fuel transition toward electricity. First, as interest in health and climate change has significantly increased in recent years in Korea, it may stimulate the transition from natural gas or propane to electricity. Second, electrification of cooking methods will be beneficial for the environment if electricity generation becomes less carbon-intensive. Since electricity in Korea is mainly generated by fossil fuels, it is crucial to implement more aggressive policies toward renewable sources in the energy mix for electricity generation. Third, the public should better understand why this problem cannot be overlooked because the energy mix is important in mitigating climate change. The better the people understand the exact relationship between energy consumption and pollutant emissions, the more effective and environmentally sound will the energy mix policy become.
引用
收藏
页码:1270 / 1287
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Modeling household cooking fuel choice: A panel multinomial logit approach
    Alem, Yonas
    Beyene, Abebe D.
    Kohlin, Gunnar
    Mekonnen, Alemu
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 : 129 - 137
  • [2] Factors affecting the consumers' willingness to pay for health and wellness food products
    Ali, Tabassum
    Ali, Jabir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2020, 2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, World Energy Outlook 2002
  • [4] Household energy choice and consumption intensity: Empirical evidence from Bhutan
    Bahadur Rahut, Dil
    Behera, Bhagirath
    Ali, Akhter
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 53 : 993 - 1009
  • [5] Rural energy in developing countries: A challenge for economic development
    Barnes, DF
    Floor, WM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 21 : 497 - 530
  • [6] Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials
    Bloess, Andreas
    Schill, Wolf-Peter
    Zerrahn, Alexander
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 : 1611 - 1626
  • [7] When households run out of fuel: Responses of rural households to decreasing fuelwood availability, Ntcheu District, Malawi
    Brouwer, ID
    Hoorweg, JC
    VanLiere, MJ
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 25 (02) : 255 - 266
  • [8] An analysis of household cooking fuel choice: a case of Bauchi State, Nigeria
    Danlami, Abubakar Hamid
    Applanaidu, Shri Dewi
    Islam, Rabiul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2018, 12 (02) : 265 - 283
  • [9] Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale
    Dunlap, RE
    Van Liere, KD
    Mertig, AG
    Jones, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) : 425 - 442
  • [10] EIA, 2020, NAT GAS EXPL NAT GAS