A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers

被引:790
作者
Zhu, Junwen [1 ]
Liu, Weishu [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat Management & Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Web of Science; Scopus; Citation database; Bibliometric analysis; Meta-analysis; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; CORE COLLECTION; CHINA; DISCIPLINARY; METAANALYSIS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Web of Science and Scopus are two world-leading and competing citation databases. By using the Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index, this paper conducts a comparative, dynamic, and empirical study focusing on the use of Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus in academic papers published during 2004 and 2018. This brief communication reveals that although both Web of Science and Scopus are increasingly used in academic papers, Scopus as a new-comer is really challenging the dominating role of WoS. Researchers from more and more countries/regions and knowledge domains are involved in the use of these two databases. Even though the main producers of related papers are developed economies, some developing economies such as China, Brazil and Iran also act important roles but with different patterns in the use of these two databases. Both two databases are widely used in meta-analysis related studies especially for researchers in China. Health/medical science related domains and the traditional Information Science and Library Science field stand out in the use of citation databases.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 335
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Use of locality sensitive hashing (LSH) algorithm to match Web of Science and Scopus [J].
Abdulhayoglu, Mehmet Ali ;
Thijs, Bart .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 116 (02) :1229-1245
[2]   Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar A content comprehensiveness comparison [J].
Adriaanse, Leslie S. ;
Rensleigh, Chris .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (06) :727-744
[3]   The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects [J].
Ellegaard, Ole .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 116 (01) :181-202
[4]   Meta-analysis in psychology: a bibliometric study [J].
Guilera, Georgina ;
Barrios, Maite ;
Gomez-Benito, Juana .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (03) :943-954
[5]   Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis [J].
Gurevitch, Jessica ;
Koricheva, Julia ;
Nakagawa, Shinichi ;
Stewart, Gavin .
NATURE, 2018, 555 (7695) :175-182
[6]   Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison [J].
Harzing, Anne-Wil ;
Alakangas, Satu .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 106 (02) :787-804
[7]   Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI's selection of highly cited papers [J].
Hu, Zhigang ;
Tian, Wencan ;
Xu, Shenmeng ;
Zhang, Chunbo ;
Wang, Xianwen .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2018, 12 (04) :1133-1145
[9]   The research trends and contributions of System's publications over the past four decades (1973-2017): A bibliometric analysis [J].
Lei, Lei ;
Liu, Dilin .
SYSTEM, 2019, 80 :1-13
[10]   Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Carley, Stephen ;
Rafols, Ismael .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (02) :589-593