Combining state and transition models with dynamic Bayesian networks

被引:25
作者
Nicholson, Ann E. [1 ]
Julia Flores, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Clayton Sch IT, Fac Informat Technol, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Sistemas Informat SIMD A I3, Albacete 02071, Spain
关键词
Rangeland management; Bayesian networks; Dynamic Bayesian networks; State-and-transition models; System dynamics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Bashari et al. (2009) propose combining state and transition models (STMs) with Bayesian networks for decision support tools where the focus is on modelling the system dynamics. There is already an extension of Bayesian networks - so-called dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) - for explicitly modelling systems that change over time, that has also been applied in ecological modelling. In this paper we propose a combination of STMs and DBNs that overcome some of the limitations of Bashari et al.'s approach including providing an explicit representation of the next state, while retaining its advantages, such an the explicit representation of transitions. We then show that the new model can be applied iteratively to predict into the future consistently with different time frames. We use Bashari et al.'s rangeland management problem as an illustrative case study. We present a comparative complexity analysis of the different approaches, based on the structure inherent in the problem being modelled. This analysis showed that any models that explicitly represent all the transitions only remain tractable when there are natural constraints in the domain. Thus we recommend modellers should analyse these aspects of their problem before deciding whether to use the framework. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 566
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROBABILISTIC REASON
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Bayesian networks and decision graphs, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GUIDELINES USING BAY
[4]   Developing decision support tools for rangeland management by combining state and transition models and Bayesian belief networks [J].
Bashari, H. ;
Smith, C. ;
Bosch, O. J. H. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 99 (01) :23-34
[5]   Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands [J].
Bestelmeyer, BT ;
Brown, JR ;
Havstad, KM ;
Alexander, R ;
Chavez, G ;
Herrick, J .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 56 (02) :114-126
[6]   A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis [J].
Borsuk, ME ;
Stow, CA ;
Reckhow, KH .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 173 (2-3) :219-239
[7]  
Boutilier C, 1996, UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P115
[8]  
DAGUM P, 1992, UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P41
[9]  
DAGUM P, 1993, UAI 93, P65
[10]  
Dawsey W. J., 2007, WORLD ENV WAT RES C