What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature

被引:437
作者
Bugge, Markus M. [1 ]
Hansen, Teis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Klitkou, Antje [1 ]
机构
[1] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ NIFU, POB 2815 Toyen, NO-0608 Oslo, Norway
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Human Geog, Solvegatan 10, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, CIRCLE, POB 117, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
bioeconomy; biotechnology; sustainability; grand challenges; review; bibliometric analysis; BIO-ECONOMY; REPRODUCTIVE WORK; BIOBASED ECONOMY; IONIC LIQUID; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGIES; GEOGRAPHY; EUROPE; POLICY;
D O I
10.3390/su8070691
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The notion of the bioeconomy has gained importance in both research and policy debates over the last decade, and is frequently argued to be a key part of the solution to multiple grand challenges. Despite this, there seems to be little consensus concerning what bioeconomy actually implies. Consequently, this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of what the notion of bioeconomy means by exploring the origins, uptake, and contents of the term "bioeconomy" in the academic literature. Firstly, we perform a bibliometric analysis that highlights that the bioeconomy research community is still rather fragmented and distributed across many different fields of science, even if natural and engineering sciences take up the most central role. Secondly, we carry out a literature review that identifies three visions of the bioeconomy. The bio-technology vision emphasises the importance of bio-technology research and application and commercialisation of bio-technology in different sectors of the economy. The bio-resource vision focuses on processing and upgrading of biological raw materials, as well as on the establishment of new value chains. Finally, the bio-ecology vision highlights sustainability and ecological processes that optimise the use of energy and nutrients, promote biodiversity, and avoid monocultures and soil degradation.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Thirty years of European biotechnology programmes: from biomolecular engineering to the bioeconomy [J].
Aguilar, Alfredo ;
Magnien, Etienne ;
Thomas, Daniel .
NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 30 (05) :410-425
[2]  
Albert S, 2007, J RURAL COMMUNITY D, V2, P64
[3]   Bio-Economy at a Crossroads. Way Forward to Sustainable Production and Consumption or Industrialization of Biomass? [J].
Albrecht, Stephan ;
Gottschick, Manuel ;
Schorling, Markus ;
Stint, Susanne .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2012, 21 (01) :33-37
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, UCINET IV: Network Analysis Software
[5]  
Reference Manual
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NETDRAW GRAPH VISUAL
[7]   Patenting human pluripotent cells: balancing commercial, academic and ethical interests [J].
Bahadur, G. ;
Morrison, M. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (01) :14-21
[8]   Knowledge, place, and power: geographies of value in the bioeconomy [J].
Birch, Kean .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2012, 31 (02) :183-201
[9]   The knowledge-space dynamic in the UK bioeconomy [J].
Birch, Kean .
AREA, 2009, 41 (03) :273-284
[10]  
Boehlje M, 2011, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V14, P1