Trends in Local Ecosystem Governance

被引:6
作者
Bork, Karrigan [1 ,2 ]
Hirokawa, Keith [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Law, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Watershed Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Albany Sch Law, Albany, NY USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
ecosystem; governance; local; collaborative; watershed; ecosystem services; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; SERVICES; LAW; INFRASTRUCTURE; BIODIVERSITY; CHALLENGES; BOTTOM; STATE;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2021.719150
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The physical and biological factors that together determine ecosystem structure and function will be subject to enormous pressures under future climate regimes. These pressures will impact ecosystem processes and services, ranging from impacts on biodiversity to loss of essential ecosystem benefits. Ecosystem management to maintain desired ecosystem conditions will become increasingly important. Existing governance structures are insufficient to provide the necessary guidance for these management efforts. The legal literature is increasingly focused on local ecosystem governance as a viable option to fill this governance gap. For example, increasing recognition of the value of ecosystem services to local communities has driven increased efforts to protect those services through local ecosystem initiatives. The local ecosystem governance scholarship is diffuse, making the literature difficult to access. Based on a review of the legal literature on local ecosystem governance over the last 20 years, this article marshals the theoretical arguments for and against local governance and identifies ongoing efforts to implement local ecosystem governance. The article also identifies both emerging challenges to local ecosystem governance and potential ways to address those challenges. From this review emerges actionable recommendations and critical research needs to improve local ecosystem governance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Adams -Schoen Sarah J., 2018, MICH. J. ENV'T & ADMIN. L., V8, P185
[2]  
Adelman DE, 2008, MINN LAW REV, V92, P1796
[3]  
Adler J., 2005, NYU Envtl. LJ, V14, P130, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.770305
[4]  
Adler R. W., 1999, UTAH LAW REV, V1999, P101
[5]  
ADLER RW, 2007, VIRGINIA ENV LAW J, V25, P55
[6]  
Andreen W, 2012, ENVIRON LAW, V42, P627
[7]  
Andreen WL, 2009, PREEMPTION CHOICE: THE THEORY, LAW, AND REALITY OF FEDERALISM'S CORE QUESTION, P257
[8]  
Angelo M. J., 2021, WILLIAM MARY LAW POL, V45, P455
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ENV LAW REP NEWS ANA
[10]  
Arnold C., 2013, Environ. Law Report, V43, P10426