Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal

被引:23
作者
Faco, Renato [1 ]
Yatabe, Marilia [2 ]
Cevidanes, Lucia H. S. [2 ]
Timmerman, Hilde
De Clerck, Hugo J. [3 ]
Garib, Daniela [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
GLENOID FOSSA CHANGES; 3-DIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT; FACE MASK; THERAPY; SKELETAL; CHILDREN; DIMENSIONS; GROWTH; GIRLS;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjz005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric outcome of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in individuals with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Material and methods: The experimental group (EG) comprised 23 individuals (17 males and 6 females) with UCLP and a mean age of 11.7 years. At least 6 months after secondary alveolar bone grafting, Bollard miniplates were installed in the posterior region of the maxilla and in the anterior region of the mandible. Class III elastics were recommended to be worn for 24 hours/day for a mean time of 18 months. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was obtained before (T1) and after treatment (T2). The control group (CG) consisted of 23 individuals with UCLP matched by initial age and gender with the EG and without any orthopaedic or surgical intervention performed between T1 and T2. The interval between T1 and T2 observations was 18 months for both groups. Twenty-one cephalometric variables were analysed. Intra- and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired and independent t-tests, respectively (P < 0.05). Results: BAMP caused a greater maxillary protrusion (SNA) and a greater decrease of Class III maxillomandibular discrepancy (ANB and Wits appraisal) compared with the CG. BAMP also caused a counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (Occ Plane to FH) and an improvement in the molar relationship compared with controls. Conclusions: BAMP therapy demonstrated a significant orthopaedic maxillary protraction and an improvement in the Class III skeletal pattern in UCLP.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 543
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Three-Year Follow-Up of a Patient With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Treated With Maxillary Protraction and Alveolar Bone Grafting: An Approach Exploring the Potential Power of Growth
    Chen, Zhengxi
    Shi, Jiajun
    Jin, Can
    Chen, Zhiyi
    Tong, Qian
    Li, Zhujun
    Chen, Zhenqi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (08) : E818 - E824
  • [42] Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment
    Ngan, Peter
    Wilmes, Benedict
    Drescher, Dieter
    Martin, Chris
    Weaver, Bryan
    Gunel, Erdogan
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 16
  • [43] Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate
    Doucet, Jean-Charles
    Herlin, Christian
    Bigorre, Michele
    Baeumler, Caroline
    Subsol, Gerard
    Captier, Guillaume
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (08) : 836 - 841
  • [44] Permanent Tooth Agenesis and Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
    Antonarakis, Gregory S.
    Fisher, David M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (05) : 648E - 656E
  • [45] Protraction Headgear Compliance and Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
    Yi, Cleo
    Shah, Nilesh
    Costello, Bernard
    Goldstein, Jesse
    Kumar, Anand
    Losee, Joseph
    Schuster, Lindsay
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2023, 60 (05) : 608 - 615
  • [46] Sella turcica dimensions and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Antonarakis, Gregory S.
    Ghislanzoni, Luis Huanca
    Fisher, David M.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (06) : E916 - E921
  • [47] Association Between Cleft Size and Crossbite in Children With Cleft Palate and Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
    Reiser, Erika
    Skoog, Valdemar
    Gerdin, Bengt
    Andlin-Sobocki, Anna
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (02) : 175 - 181
  • [48] Oral Health Assessment in Cleft Lip & Palate Patients During Orthodontic Treatment for Maxillary Protraction: A Periodontal & Microbiological Study
    Batra, Shweta Gupta
    Khatri, Manish
    Bansal, Mansi
    Batra, Puneet
    Khatri, Ayush
    Aziz, Sana Bint
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [49] Effect of alveolar bone grafting in the mixed dentition on maxillary growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
    Daskalogiannakis, J
    Ross, RB
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 1997, 34 (05) : 455 - 458
  • [50] Comparison of tooth development stage of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after secondary alveolar bone graft Unilateral cleft lip and alveolus vs unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Park, Heon-Mook
    Han, Dong-Hun
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (06) : 989 - 994