Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal

被引:23
|
作者
Faco, Renato [1 ]
Yatabe, Marilia [2 ]
Cevidanes, Lucia H. S. [2 ]
Timmerman, Hilde
De Clerck, Hugo J. [3 ]
Garib, Daniela [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
GLENOID FOSSA CHANGES; 3-DIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT; FACE MASK; THERAPY; SKELETAL; CHILDREN; DIMENSIONS; GROWTH; GIRLS;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjz005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric outcome of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in individuals with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Material and methods: The experimental group (EG) comprised 23 individuals (17 males and 6 females) with UCLP and a mean age of 11.7 years. At least 6 months after secondary alveolar bone grafting, Bollard miniplates were installed in the posterior region of the maxilla and in the anterior region of the mandible. Class III elastics were recommended to be worn for 24 hours/day for a mean time of 18 months. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was obtained before (T1) and after treatment (T2). The control group (CG) consisted of 23 individuals with UCLP matched by initial age and gender with the EG and without any orthopaedic or surgical intervention performed between T1 and T2. The interval between T1 and T2 observations was 18 months for both groups. Twenty-one cephalometric variables were analysed. Intra- and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired and independent t-tests, respectively (P < 0.05). Results: BAMP caused a greater maxillary protrusion (SNA) and a greater decrease of Class III maxillomandibular discrepancy (ANB and Wits appraisal) compared with the CG. BAMP also caused a counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (Occ Plane to FH) and an improvement in the molar relationship compared with controls. Conclusions: BAMP therapy demonstrated a significant orthopaedic maxillary protraction and an improvement in the Class III skeletal pattern in UCLP.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 543
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate: A literature review of study design, type and protocol, and treatment outcomes
    Ahn, Hyo-Won
    Kim, Su-Jung
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 : 21 - 30
  • [22] Rationale and design for efficacy and safety evaluation of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal anterior crossbite: a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study protocol
    Shimada, Eriya
    Kanetaka, Hiroyasu
    Yamauchi, Kensuke
    Takahashi, Tetsu
    Nochioka, Kotaro
    Igarashi, Kaoru
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [23] Biomechanical Effects on Maxillary Protraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton With Cleft Lip and Palate After Alveolar Bone Graft
    Chen, Zhengxi
    Pan, Xiaogang
    Shao, Qinghua
    Chen, Zhenqi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 446 - 453
  • [24] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP: A case report
    Garib, Daniela
    Pugliese, Fernando
    Kato, Renata Mayumi
    Faco, Renato
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Timmerman, Hilde
    De Clerck, Hugo
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2020, 90 (05) : 734 - 741
  • [25] Effect of microimplant assisted rapid palatal expansion on bone-anchored maxillary protraction: A finite element analysis
    Suresh, Sugitha
    Sundareswaran, Shobha
    Sathyanadhan, Sreehari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 160 (04) : 523 - 532
  • [27] Cephalometric evaluation of patients with unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate
    Montanari, Valentina
    Bruno, Giovanni
    Cavallin, Francesco
    Baciliero, Ugo
    De Stefani, Alberto
    Gracco, Antonio
    MINERVA PEDIATRICS, 2022, 74 (02): : 160 - 166
  • [28] Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Zhang, Yixin
    Fu, Zhen
    Jia, Haichao
    Huang, Yiping
    Li, Xiaobei
    Liu, Hao
    Li, Weiran
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2019, 89 (02) : 214 - 220
  • [29] Bone anchored maxillary protraction
    Mathur, Ajay
    Toshniwal, N. G.
    Kharbanda, Om P.
    Thakur, Arvind
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 141 (05) : 530 - 531
  • [30] Is Cleft Severity Related to Maxillary Growth in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate?
    Chiu, Yu-Ting
    Liao, Yu-Fang
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (05) : 535 - 540