Distributed WFQ scheduling converging to weighted max-min fairness

被引:1
|
作者
Chrysos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Katevenis, Manolis [2 ]
机构
[1] IBM Res GmbH, Zurich Res Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas FORTH, Inst Comp Sci ICS, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
关键词
Switching networks; Distributed WFQ scheduling; Fairness; QoS;
D O I
10.1016/j.comnet.2010.10.011
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper studies the fairness properties of distributed WFQ scheduling in buffered crossbars. Using a fluid model, we prove that these networks converge to ideal weighted max-min fair allocation. We simulate the cell-based system, and observe how close real rates come to the theoretical WMM fair: with buffer sizes of 2-5 cells per crosspoint, the average rate discrepancy is below 1%; the worst-case discrepancy falls below 4% with 4- to 8-cell buffers. We also study the transient phenomena when some flows come and go. We find that, after a change in a flow's state, rate changes visit flows along non-circular paths, stabilizing them to their new fair rates; interestingly, some flows can affect all other active flows in the crossbar. Regarding the factors that influence the stabilization delay, although larger buffers yield more accurate convergence, they increase stabilization delay. Larger networks may also take more time to stabilize. Finally, convergence speeds up as the difference between the present rates and the WMM fair rates increases. Transient behavior simulations verify these results. Although we deal with data crossbar networks only, our analysis reveals complicated, "multi-hop" interactions among the flows in the crossbar, similar to those that can appear in arbitrary, point-to-point networks with distributed WFQ schedulers and backpressure mechanisms, such as the scheduling sub-system of a multi-stage switching fabric. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 806
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A distributed algorithm for weighted max-min fairness in MPLS networks
    Skivée, F
    Leduc, G
    TELECOMMUICATIONS AND NETWORKING - ICT 2004, 2004, 3124 : 644 - 653
  • [2] Scheduling Jobs across Geo-Distributed Datacenters with Max-Min Fairness
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Shuhao
    Li, Baochun
    Li, Bo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 6 (03): : 488 - 500
  • [3] Scheduling Jobs across Geo-Distributed Datacenters with Max-Min Fairness
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Shuhao
    Li, Baochun
    Li, Bo
    IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2017,
  • [4] Converging to approximated max-min flow fairness in logarithmic time
    Awerbuch, B
    Shavitt, Y
    IEEE INFOCOM '98 - THE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS. 1-3: GATEWAY TO THE 21ST CENTURY, 1998, : 1350 - 1357
  • [5] Maximum flow routing with weighted max-min fairness
    Allalouf, M
    Shavitt, Y
    QUALITY OF SERVICE IN THE EMERGING NETWORKING PANORAMA, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3266 : 278 - 287
  • [6] Upward Max-Min Fairness
    Danna, Emilie
    Hassidim, Avinatan
    Kaplan, Haim
    Kumar, Alok
    Mansour, Yishay
    Raz, Danny
    Segalov, Michal
    JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2017, 64 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [7] Max-Min Fairness based Scheduling Optimization Mechanism on Switches
    Lu, Xijia
    Wang, Xingwei
    Jia, Jie
    Wang, Xue
    Huang, Min
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE, COMPUTING, AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, IPCCC, 2022,
  • [8] Distributed Protocols for scheduling and rate control to achieve max-min fairness in wireless mesh networks
    Jain, Shweta
    Das, Samir R.
    Gupta, Himanshu
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON A WORLD OF WIRELESS, MOBILE AND MULTIMEDIA NETWORKS, VOL 1, 2007, : 340 - 347
  • [9] A simple ABR switch algorithm for the weighted max-min fairness policy
    Hou, YT
    Tzeng, HHY
    Panwar, SS
    IEEE ATM '97 WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 329 - 338
  • [10] Resource Allocation for Weighted Max-min Fairness in NOMA with Imperfect SIC
    Dhakal, Dhruba Raj
    Pan, Zhenni
    Shimamoto, Shigeru
    2022 IEEE/SICE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEM INTEGRATION (SII 2022), 2022, : 957 - 962