Impact of deprescribing dual-purpose medications on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Shrestha, Shakti [1 ]
Poudel, Arjun [2 ]
Cardona, Magnolia [3 ]
Steadman, Kathryn J. [4 ]
Nissen, Lisa M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Pharm, Pharm Australia Ctr Excellence, Level 4,20 Cornwall St, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, EBP Professorial Unit, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Pharm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
deprescribing; end of life; limited life expectancy; older adults; potentially inappropriate medication; POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATIONS; PALLIATIVE CARE; POPULATION; EXPECTANCY; CRITERIA; THERAPY; BENEFIT; HEALTH; FALLS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1177/20420986211052343
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (dual-purpose medications or DPMs) is often challenging for clinicians. We aim to establish the impact of deprescribing DPMs on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life (EOL). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Literature was searched on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar until December 2019 for studies on deprescribing intervention with a control group (with or without randomisation); targeting > 65-year olds, at EOL, with at least one life-limiting illness and at least one potentially inappropriate DPM. We were interested in any patient-related outcomes. Studies with similar outcome assessment criteria were subjected to meta-analysis and narrative synthesis otherwise. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental non-randomised controlled studies, respectively. Results: Five studies covering 689 participants with mean age 81.6-85.7 years, the majority (74.6-100%) with dementia were included. The risk of bias was moderate to low. The deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44-0.79) and referral to acute care facilities (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22-0.73), but did not have a significant impact on the risk of falls, non-vertebral fracture, emergency presentation, unplanned hospital admission, or general practitioner visits. No significant difference was observed in the quality of life, physical and cognitive functions between the intervention and control groups. Conclusion: There is some evidence that deprescribing of DPMs for older adults near the EOL can lower the risk of mortality and referral to acute care facilities, but there are insufficient good-quality studies powered to confirm a benefit in terms of quality of life, physical or cognitive function, health service utilisation and adverse events. Plain Language Summary What is the health impact of withdrawal or dose reduction of medication used for disease prevention and symptom control in older adults near end-of-life? Introduction: Older adults (aged > 65 years) with advanced diseases such as cancer, dementia, and organ failure tend to have a limited life expectancy. With the progression of these diseases towards the end-of-life, the intensity for day-to-day supportive care becomes increasingly necessary. The use of medications for symptom management is a critical part of such care, but the use of medications for long-term disease prevention can become irrelevant due to the already shortened life expectancy and may become harmful due to alterations in physiology and pharmacology associated with age and frailty. This necessitates the withdrawal or dose reduction of inappropriate medications, the process called deprescribing. The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (DPMs) in this population is often challenging for clinicians. In this context, whether deprescribing of DPMs can improve patient-related health outcomes is unknown. Methods: Evidence from the literature was reviewed and analysed, and the quality of studies was assessed. Five studies were identified, which had 689 participants with an average age above 80 years and mostly suffering from dementia. Results: The analysis of these studies showed deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of death and referral to acute care facilities at 12 months but had no significant impact on falls, non-vertebral fractures, emergency presentations, unplanned hospital admission, general practitioner visits, quality of life, physical and mental functions. Conclusion: In conclusion, there were insufficient numbers of high-quality studies powered to confirm whether deprescribing of DPMs reduces adverse events, health service use, or improves the quality of life or functioning in older adults near the end of life.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying patients with advanced chronic conditions for a progressive palliative care approach: a cross-sectional study of prognostic indicators related to end-of-life trajectories
    Amblas-Novellas, J.
    Murray, S. A.
    Espaulella, J.
    Martori, J. C.
    Oller, R.
    Martinez-Munoz, M.
    Molist, N.
    Blay, C.
    Gomez-Batiste, X.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [2] Appropriateness of Medications Prescribed to Elderly Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and Limited Life Expectancy Who Died During Hospitalization
    Barcelo, Montserrat
    Torres, Olga
    Ruiz, Domingo
    Casademont, Jordi
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2014, 31 (07) : 541 - 546
  • [3] Discontinuation of antidepressants in people with dementia and neuropsychiatric symptoms (DESEP study): double blind, randomised, parallel group, placebo controlled trial
    Bergh, Sverre
    Selbaek, Geir
    Engedal, Knut
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [4] Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative, 2013, GUID PHARM MAN END L
  • [5] Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting
    Bush, Shirley Harvey
    Tierney, Sallyanne
    Lawlor, Peter Gerard
    [J]. DRUGS, 2017, 77 (15) : 1623 - 1643
  • [6] Development of a tool for defining and identifying the dying patient in hospital: Criteria for Screening and Triaging to Appropriate aLternative care (CriSTAL)
    Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia
    Hillman, Ken
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 5 (01) : 78 - 90
  • [7] How meta-analysis increases statistical power
    Cohn, LD
    Becker, BJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (03) : 243 - 253
  • [8] Age-Related Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Changes and Related Risk of Adverse Drug Reactions
    Corsonello, A.
    Pedone, C.
    Incalzi, R. Antonelli
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 17 (06) : 571 - 584
  • [9] Challenges of deprescribing in the multimorbid patient
    Cullinan, Shane
    Hansen, Christina Raae
    Byrne, Stephen
    O'Mahony, Denis
    Kearney, Patricia
    Sahm, Laura
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2017, 24 (01) : 43 - U67
  • [10] Prescribing in palliative care as death approaches
    Currow, David C.
    Stevenson, James P.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Plummer, John
    Shelby-James, Tania M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (04) : 590 - 595