Synergistic use of soft computing technologies for fault detection in gas turbine engines

被引:0
作者
Uluyol, Ö [1 ]
Kim, K [1 ]
Menon, S [1 ]
Nwadiogbu, EO [1 ]
机构
[1] Honeywell Engines, Syst & Serv, Minneapolis, MN 55418 USA
来源
SMCIA/03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFT COMPUTING IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS | 2003年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present a synergistic approach to startup fault detection and diagnosis in gas turbine engines. The method employs statistics; signal processing and soft computing techniques in a complementary manner to address fault detection at transient conditions. Traditional turbine engine fault detection and diagnosis methods are based on engine data collected at steady-state conditions. However, incipient faults are difficult to diagnose using steady-state engine data; only engine faults that are fairly developed can be detected using conventional methods. Because incipient engine component faults are often manifest in the engine startup characteristics, we present a method or characterizing the engine transient startup using the following steps: Engine sensor data during engine startup are recorded in time series format. The sensor profiles corresponding to "good" and "bad" engine startups are sampled using the bootstrap technique. A feature vector is extracted from these data using principal component analysis (PCA). Then, several important discriminating features are distilled from the feature vector. The features obtained from this step are then classified using neural-network-based methods. The "leave-one-out" approach to cross-validation is applied to obtain an objective evaluation of the neural network training. The proposed fault detection and diagnosis method is evaluated using actual engine startup data and the results are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Data visualization, data reduction and classifier fusion for intelligent fault detection and diagnosis in gas turbine engines [J].
Donat, William ;
Choi, Kihoon ;
An, Woosun ;
Singh, Satnam ;
Pattipati, Krishna .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2007, VOL 1, 2007, :883-892
[32]   POWER SETTING SENSOR FAULT DETECTION AND ACCOMMODATION FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINES USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
Courdier, A. ;
Li, Y. G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 6, 2016,
[33]   CERAMIC BEARINGS FOR USE IN GAS-TURBINE ENGINES [J].
ZARETSKY, EV .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1989, 111 (01) :146-154
[34]   COMBINED USE OF HYDROGEN IN GAS TURBINE ENGINES. [J].
Kanilo, P.M. .
Soviet Machine Science (English Translation of Mashinovedenie), 1985, (01) :115-118
[35]   PARAMETER SELECTION FOR MULTIPLE FAULT DIAGNOSTICS OF GAS-TURBINE ENGINES [J].
URBAN, LA .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1975, 97 (02) :225-230
[36]   Fault diagnosis and prognosis of gas turbine engines based on qualitative modeling [J].
Kim, Kyusung ;
Mylaraswamy, Dinkar .
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2006, Vol 2, 2006, :881-889
[37]   Fault diagnosis and prognosis for fuel supply systems in gas turbine engines [J].
Kim, K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2009, 223 (03) :757-768
[38]   FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF GAS TURBINE ENGINES BY USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
Mohammadi, Rasul ;
Naderi, Esmaeil ;
Khorasani, Khashayar ;
Hashtrudi-Zad, Shahin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2010, VOL 3, 2010, :365-376
[39]   Fault diagnosis and prognosis for fuel supply system in gas turbine engines [J].
Kim, Kyusung ;
Uluyol, Onder ;
Ball, Charles .
Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol 1, Pts A-C, 2005, :583-590
[40]   Semantic Sensor Fusion for Fault Diagnosis in Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines [J].
Sarkar, Soumik ;
Singh, Dheeraj Sharan ;
Srivastav, Abhishek ;
Ray, Asok .
2011 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2011, :220-225