Using evidence-based medicine to protect healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: Is it possible?

被引:3
作者
Gralton, Jan [1 ]
McLaws, Mary-Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
pandemic; masks; vaccination; antiviral; influenza; infection control; ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME; HONG-KONG INFLUENZA; NEURAMINIDASE INHIBITOR OSELTAMIVIR; SARS TRANSMISSION; ANTIBODY-RESPONSE; INFECTION-CONTROL; VIRUS VACCINE; INACTIVATED VACCINES; SUBUNIT VACCINES; WORKING ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa3c28
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To use evidence-based principles to develop infection control algorithms to ensure the protection of healthcare workers and the continuity of health service provision during a pandemic. Design: Evidence-based algorithms were developed from published research as well as "needs and values" assessments. Research evidence was obtained from 97 studies reporting the protectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis, seasonal vaccination, and mask use. Needs and values assessments were undertaken by international experts in pandemic infection control and local healthcare workers. Opportunity and resources costs were not determined. Setting: The Australian government commissioned the development of an evidence-based algorithm for inclusion in the 2008 revision of the Australian Health and Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza. Participants: Two international infection control teams responsible for healthcare worker safety during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome outbreak reviewed the evidence-based algorithms. The algorithms were then reviewed for needs and values by eight local clinicians who were considered key frontline clinicians during the contain and sustain phases. The international teams reviewed for practicability of implementation, whereas local clinicians reviewed for clinician compliance. Results: Despite strong evidence for vaccination and antiviral prophylaxis providing significant protection, clinicians believed they required the additional combinations of both masks and face shields. Despite the equivocal evidence for the efficacy of surgical and N95 masks and the provision of algorithms appropriate for the level of risk according to clinical care during a pandemic, clinicians still demanded N95 masks plus face shields in combination with prophylaxis and novel vaccination. Conclusions: Conventional evidence-based principles could not be applied to formulate recommendations due to the lack of pandemic-specific efficacy data of protection tools and the inherent unpredictability of pandemics. As an alternative, evidence-based principles have been used to formulate recommendations while giving priority to the needs and values of healthcare workers over the research evidence. (Crit Care Med 2011; 39:170-178)
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 178
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protecting healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: N95 or surgical masks?
    Gralton, Jan
    McLaws, Mary-Louise
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (02) : 657 - 667
  • [2] Evidence-based medicine and the governance of pandemic influenza
    Kamradt-Scott, Adam
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 7 : S111 - S126
  • [3] Risk for dental healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 global pandemic: An evidence-based assessment
    Ren, Yanfang
    Feng, Changyong
    Rasubala, Linda
    Malmstrom, Hans
    Eliav, Eli
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 101
  • [4] Control of influenza in healthcare settings: early lessons from the 2009 pandemic
    Carlson, Abigail L.
    Budd, Alicia P.
    Perl, Trish M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 23 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [5] Perception in relation to a potential influenza pandemic among healthcare workers in Japan: Implications for preparedness
    Imai, Teppei
    Takahashi, Ken
    Todoroki, Miwako
    Kunishima, Hiroyuki
    Hoshuyama, Tsutornu
    Ide, Reiko
    Kawasaki, Takashi
    Koyama, Nobuya
    Endo, Kazuo
    Fujita, Hiroshi
    Iwata, Kentaro
    Koh, Gerald
    Chia, Sin Eng
    Koh, David
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2008, 50 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [6] Accounting for personal and professional choices for pandemic influenza vaccination amongst English healthcare workers
    Marcu, Afrodita
    Rubinstein, Helena
    Michie, Susan
    Yardley, Lucy
    VACCINE, 2015, 33 (19) : 2267 - 2272
  • [7] Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic
    Lewthwaite, P.
    Campion, K.
    Blackburn, B.
    Kemp, E.
    Major, D.
    Sarangi, K.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2014, 64 (05): : 348 - 351
  • [8] INFLUENZA VACCINATION IN HEALTHCARE WORKERS - VACCINATION COVERAGE, DETERMINANTS, POSSIBLE INTERVENTIONS
    Jedrzejek, Michal
    Mastalerz-Migas, Agnieszka
    MEDYCYNA PRACY, 2021, 72 (03) : 305 - 319
  • [9] Challenges for the practice of evidence-based medicine during COVID-19 pandemic (practice of evidence-based medicine in the new normal)
    Kotur, Premanath Fakirayya
    Kotur, Pushpa
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (04) : 290 - 293
  • [10] Acceptance of a vaccine against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus amongst healthcare workers in Beijing, China
    Seale, H.
    Kaur, R.
    Wang, Q.
    Yang, P.
    Zhang, Y.
    Wang, X.
    Li, X.
    Zhang, H.
    Zhang, Z.
    MacIntyre, C. R.
    VACCINE, 2011, 29 (08) : 1605 - 1610