Patient involvement 2.0: Experience-based co-design supported by action research

被引:35
作者
Gustavsson, Susanne M. K. [1 ,2 ]
Andersson, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Skaraborgs Hosp, Dept Qual & Patient Safety, Skovde, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Ctr Healthcare Improvement, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Skovde, Sch Business, Business Adm, Skovde, Sweden
关键词
Patient involvement; experience-based co-design; action research; improvements; healthcare; pediatrics; HEALTH-CARE; PARTICIPATION; IMPROVEMENTS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1177/1476750317723965
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Strong professionals who influence the development of healthcare services have dominated healthcare organizations for many years. However, this dominance has been challenged recently through patient involvement. One method of achieving patient involvement is experience-based co-design (EBCD), in which patients and healthcare professionals work together to improve care. Patient involvement has considerable potential, but also presents certain challenges. This article addresses these challenges using experiences from patients and healthcare professionals who participated in two action research projects that aimed to improve patient experienced quality using EBCD in pediatric care. The paper shows that patient involvement in quality improvements can challenge the traditional roles of professionals and patients by new roles as co-designers. The role as co-designer embraces new perspectives for healthcare professionals that force them to step out of their comfort zone. Accordingly, healthcare professionals are able to view patients as equal partners in improvement work. Reflecting dialogues during the projects offered eye-opening stories for patients and healthcare professionals that enabled them to construct a common picture of care. The contribution of this study is strengthening earlier research that argues that an action research approach can strengthen important values for successful EBCD projects: equal partnerships, new roles, and dialogue. The findings show that the combination of EBCD and action research is a promising approach to address the challenges of patient involvement in healthcare improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 491
页数:23
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]  
Liff Roy, 2011, J Health Organ Manag, V25, P658
[32]   Special Issue: Action Research and Healthcare Guest Editors: Svante Lifvergren, Tony Huzzard, Andreas Hellstrom [J].
Lifvergren, Svante ;
Huzzard, Tony ;
Hellstrom, Andreas .
ACTION RESEARCH, 2015, 13 (01) :3-8
[33]   Subjective experience or objective process Understanding the gap between values and practice for involving patients in designing patient-centred care [J].
Lord, Laura ;
Gale, Nicola .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (06) :714-730
[34]   Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience [J].
Luxford, Karen ;
Safran, Dana Gelb ;
Delbanco, Tom .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2011, 23 (05) :510-515
[35]  
Maher L., 2009, BRIT J HEALTHCARE MA, V15, P172, DOI [10.12968/bjhc.2009.15.4.41719, DOI 10.12968/BJHC.2009.15.4.41719]
[36]   Collaborating with consumer and community representatives in health and medical research in Australia: results from an evaluation [J].
Payne, Janet M. ;
D'Antoine, Heather A. ;
France, Kathryn E. ;
McKenzie, Anne E. ;
Henley, Nadine ;
Bartu, Anne E. ;
Elliott, Elizabeth J. ;
Bower, Carol .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 9
[37]  
Pickles J., 2008, An International Journal, V13, P51, DOI [10.1108/14777270810850634, DOI 10.1108/14777270810850634]
[38]  
Reason P., 2001, CONCEPTS TRANSFORMAT, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1075/CAT.6.1.02REA
[39]  
Reason P., 2009, The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice
[40]  
Robert G., 2013, Understanding and using health experiences: Improving patient care, P138, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199665372.003.0014