Research utility of the National Violent Death Reporting System: a scoping review

被引:22
作者
Nazarov, Oybek [1 ,3 ]
Guan, Joseph [2 ]
Chihuri, Stanford [1 ,3 ]
Li, Guohua [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Rush Med Coll, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Ctr Injury Epidemiol & Prevent, 622 West 168th St,PH5-534, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Epidemiology; Homicide; Injury; Knowledge domain; National Violent Death Reporting System; Scoping review; Suicide; Violence; CALL;
D O I
10.1186/s40621-019-0196-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo better understand and prevent suicide and homicide, the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) in six states in 2002. As of 2018, the NVDRS has been expanded to include all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The purpose of this review was to assess the research utility of the NVDRS based on studies indexed in major bibliographical databases.MethodsWe performed a scoping review of published studies that were based on data from the NVDRS, identified by searching six electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, OVID, Scopus, and Web of Science. We examined the time trend of annual NVDRS-based research output, generated a word cloud using the keywords listed in the publications, and mapped the knowledge domains covered by NVDRS-based studies.ResultsOur review included a total of 150 studies published between 2005 and 2018. There was a marked increase in the annual number of NVDRS-based publications, with 120 (80.0%) of the 150 studies published between 2011 and 2018. Overall, 104 (69.3%) studies focused on suicide and 39 (26.0%) on homicide. Of the included studies, 100 (66.7%) were descriptive epidemiology, 31 (20.7%) were risk factor analyses, 9 (6.0%) were evaluations, 7 (4.7%) were trend analyses, and 4 (2.7%) were data quality assessments. Knowledge domain mapping identified two major clusters of studies, one on suicide and the other on homicide. The cluster on suicide was commonly linked to "circumstance," "alcohol" and "substance abuse" and the cluster on homicide was commonly linked to "firearm," "injury," and "gang." The two clusters were interlinked to overlapping networks of keywords, such as "firearm" and "mental health problem."ConclusionsResearch utility of the NVDRS has increased considerably in recent years. Studies based on data from the NVDRS are clustered in two knowledge domains - suicide and homicide. The vast potential of the NVDRS for violence research and prevention remains to be fully exploited.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reducing "Unknown" Data in Violent Death Surveillance: A Study of Death Certificates, Coroner/Medical Examiner and Police Reports From the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003-2004
    Logan, Joseph E.
    Karch, Debra L.
    Crosby, Alexander E.
    HOMICIDE STUDIES, 2009, 13 (04) : 385 - 397
  • [32] Selection bias and misclassification in case-control studies conducted using the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Lyons, Vivian H.
    Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
    Adhia, Avanti
    Weiss, Noel S.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2020, 26 (06) : 566 - 568
  • [33] The prevalence of work-related suicides varies by reporting source from the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Peek-Asa, Corinne
    Zhang, Ling
    Hamann, Cara
    Davis, Jonathon
    Casteel, Carri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2021, 64 (07) : 585 - 592
  • [34] Sociodemographic predictors of suicide means in a population-based surveillance system: Findings from the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Liu, Richard T.
    Kraines, Morganne A.
    Puzia, Megan E.
    Massing-Schaffer, Maya
    Kleiman, Evan M.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 151 (02) : 449 - 454
  • [35] Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020
    Liu, Grace S.
    Nguyen, Brenda L.
    Lyons, Bridget H.
    Sheats, Kameron J.
    Wilson, Rebecca F.
    Betz, Carter J.
    Fowler, Katherine A.
    MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2023, 72 (05): : 1 - +
  • [36] Examining differences between mass, multiple, and single-victim homicides to inform prevention: findings from the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Fowler, Katherine A.
    Leavitt, Rachel A.
    Betz, Carter J.
    Yuan, Keming
    Dahlberg, Linda L.
    INJURY EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [37] Limitations of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Information as Reported in the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Clark, Kirsty A.
    Blosnich, John R.
    LGBT HEALTH, 2024, 11 (03) : 173 - 177
  • [38] Examining differences between mass, multiple, and single-victim homicides to inform prevention: findings from the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Katherine A. Fowler
    Rachel A. Leavitt
    Carter J. Betz
    Keming Yuan
    Linda L. Dahlberg
    Injury Epidemiology, 8
  • [39] Suicide Among RNs: An Analysis of 2015 Data from the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Patrician, Patricia A.
    Peterson, Cora
    McGuinness, Teena M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2020, 120 (10) : 24 - 28
  • [40] Details on suicide among US physicians: data from the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Gold, Katherine J.
    Sen, Ananda
    Schwenk, Thomas L.
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 35 (01) : 45 - 49