Neural Correlates of Sex/Gender Differences in Humor Processing for Different Joke Types

被引:25
作者
Chan, Yu-Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Thing Hua Univ, Inst Learning Sci, Hsinchu, Taiwan
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2016年 / 7卷
关键词
fMRI; sex/gender; verbal jokes; humor techniques; logical mechanisms; tri-component theory of humor; ANTERIOR PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SEX-DIFFERENCES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; LOGICAL MECHANISMS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; BRAIN ACTIVATION; SOCIAL COGNITION; REWARD; APPRECIATION; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00536
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humor operates through a variety of techniques, which first generate surprise and then amusement and laughter once the unexpected incongruity is resolved. As different types of jokes use different techniques, the corresponding humor processes also differ. The present study builds on the framework of the 'tri-component theory of humor,' which details the mechanisms involved in cognition (comprehension), affect (appreciation), and laughter (expression). This study seeks to identify differences among joke types and between sexes/genders in the neural mechanisms underlying humor processing. Three types of verbal jokes, bridging-inference jokes (BJs), exaggeration jokes (EJs), and ambiguity jokes (AJs), were used as stimuli. The findings revealed differences in brain activity for an interaction between sex/gender and joke type. For BJs, women displayed greater activation in the ternporoparietal mesocortical-motor network than men, demonstrating the importance of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) presumably for 'theory of mind' processing, the orbitofrontal cortex for motivational functions and reward coding, and the supplementary motor area for laughter. Women also showed greater activation than men in the frontal-mesolimbic network associated with EJs, including the anterior (frontopolar) prefrontal cortex (aPFC, BA 10) for executive control processes, and the amygdala and midbrain for reward anticipation and salience processes. Conversely, AJs elicited greater activation in men than women in the frontal-paralimbic network, including the dorsal prefrontal cortex (dPFC) and parahippocampal gyrus. All joke types elicited greater activation in the aPFC of women than of men, whereas men showed greater activation than women in the dPFC. To confirm the findings related to sex/gender differences, random group analysis and within group variance analysis were also performed. These findings help further establish the mechanisms underlying the processing of different joke types for the sexes/genders and provide a neural foundation for a theory of sex/gender differences in humor.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Ha Ha! Versus Aha! A Direct Comparison of Humor to Nonhumorous Insight for Determining the Neural Correlates of Mirth [J].
Amir, Ori ;
Biederman, Irving ;
Wang, Zhuangjun ;
Xu, Xiaokun .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2015, 25 (05) :1405-1413
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Evolutionary Psychology, DOI [10.1177/147470490600400129, DOI 10.1177/147470490600400129]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Chin. J. Psychol.
[6]   Prefrontal Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility and Stability [J].
Armbruster, Diana J. N. ;
Ueltzhoeffer, Kai ;
Basten, Ulrike ;
Fiebach, Christian J. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 24 (12) :2385-2399
[7]   Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions [J].
Attardo, S ;
Hempelmann, CF ;
Di Maio, S .
HUMOR-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMOR RESEARCH, 2002, 15 (01) :3-46
[8]  
Attardo S, 2001, HUMOROUS TEXTS SEMAN, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110887969
[9]  
Attardo S., 1991, HUMOR, V4, P293, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293, DOI 10.1515/HUMR.1991.4.3-4.293, 10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293]
[10]   Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor [J].
Azim, E ;
Mobbs, D ;
Jo, B ;
Menon, V ;
Reiss, AL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (45) :16496-16501