The circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) alteration level predicts therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer: Novel prognostic indexes based on ctDNA

被引:24
作者
Liu, Binliang [1 ]
Hu, Zheyu [1 ]
Ran, Jialu [2 ]
Xie, Ning [1 ]
Tian, Can [1 ]
Tang, Yu [3 ]
Ouyang, Quchang [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Canc Med Oncol, Hunan Canc Hosp,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Heath, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Cent South Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Xiangya Hosp 3, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Circulating tumor DNA; Genetic alterations; Progression -free survival (PFS); RESISTANCE; PLASMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has good clinical guiding value for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. This study aimed to apply a novel genetic analysis approach for therapeutic prediction based on ctDNA alterations. Method: This nonrandomized, multicenter study recruited 223 MBC patients (NCT05079074). Plasma samples were collected for target-capture deep sequencing of ctDNA at baseline, after the 2nd cycle of treatment, and when progressive disease (PD) was evaluated. Samples were categorized into four levels according to the number of ctDNA alterations: level 1 (no alterations), level 2 (1-2 alterations), level 3 (3-4 alterations) and level 4 (>= 5 alterations). According to ctDNA alteration level and variant allele frequency (VAF), a novel ctDNA-level Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors (ctle-RECIST) was established to assess treatment response and predict progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The median PFS in level 1 (6.63 months) patients was significantly longer than that in level 2-4 patients (level 2: 5.70 months; level 3-4: 4.90 months, p < 0.05). After 2 cycles of treatment, based on ctle-RECIST, the median PFS of level-based disease control rate (lev-DCR) patients was significantly longer than that of level -based PD (lev-PD) patients [HR 2.42 (1.52-3.85), p < 0.001]. In addition, we found that ctDNA level assess-ment could be a good supplement to radiologic assessment. The median PFS in the dual-DCR group tended to be longer than that in the single-DCR group [HR 1.41 (0.93-2.13), p = 0.107]. Conclusion: The ctDNA alteration level and ctle-RECIST could be novel biomarkers of prognosis and could complement radiologic assessment in MBC.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 123
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: A comprehensive review [J].
Alimirzaie, Sahar ;
Bagherzadeh, Maryam ;
Akbari, Mohammad R. .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2019, 95 (06) :643-660
[2]   Somatic alterations as the basis for resistance to targeted therapies [J].
Blair, Brian G. ;
Bardelli, Alberto ;
Park, Ben Ho .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2014, 232 (02) :244-254
[3]   Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA as a response and follow-up marker in cancer therapy [J].
Boonstra, Pieter A. ;
Wind, Thijs T. ;
van Kruchten, Michel ;
Schuuring, Ed ;
Hospers, Geke A. P. ;
van der Wekken, Anthonie J. ;
de Groot, Derk-Jan ;
Schroeder, Carolien P. ;
Fehrmann, Rudolf S. N. ;
Reyners, Anna K. L. .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2020, 39 (03) :999-1013
[4]   Optimizing panel-based tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurement [J].
Budczies, J. ;
Allgauer, M. ;
Litchfield, K. ;
Rempel, E. ;
Christopoulos, P. ;
Kazdal, D. ;
Endris, V. ;
Thomas, M. ;
Froehling, S. ;
Peters, S. ;
Swanton, C. ;
Schirmacher, P. ;
Stenzinger, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (09) :1496-1506
[5]   The American Cancer Society challenge goal to reduce US cancer mortality by 50% between 1990 and 2015: Results and reflections [J].
Byers, Tim ;
Wender, Richard C. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Baskies, Arnold M. ;
Ward, Elizabeth E. ;
Brawley, Otis W. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (05) :359-369
[6]   Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden [J].
Chalmers, Zachary R. ;
Connelly, Caitlin F. ;
Fabrizio, David ;
Gay, Laurie ;
Ali, Siraj M. ;
Ennis, Riley ;
Schrock, Alexa ;
Campbell, Brittany ;
Shlien, Adam ;
Chmielecki, Juliann ;
Huang, Franklin ;
He, Yuting ;
Sun, James ;
Tabori, Uri ;
Kennedy, Mark ;
Lieber, Daniel S. ;
Roels, Steven ;
White, Jared ;
Otto, Geoffrey A. ;
Ross, Jeffrey S. ;
Garraway, Levi ;
Miller, Vincent A. ;
Stephens, Phillip J. ;
Frampton, Garrett M. .
GENOME MEDICINE, 2017, 9
[7]   Analysis of ctDNA to predict prognosis and monitor treatment responses in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients [J].
Cheng, He ;
Liu, Chen ;
Jiang, Jiahao ;
Luo, Guopei ;
Lu, Yu ;
Jin, Kaizhou ;
Guo, Meng ;
Zhang, Zhenzhen ;
Xu, Jin ;
Liu, Liang ;
Ni, Quanxing ;
Yu, Xianjun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 140 (10) :2344-2350
[8]   Circulating tumor DNA as a dynamic biomarker of response to palbociclib and fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer patients [J].
Darrigues, Lauren ;
Pierga, Jean-Yves ;
Bernard-Tessier, Alice ;
Bieche, Ivan ;
Silveira, Amanda Bartolini ;
Michel, Marc ;
Loirat, Delphine ;
Cottu, Paul ;
Cabel, Luc ;
Dubot, Coraline ;
Geiss, Romain ;
Ricci, Francesco ;
Vincent-Salomon, Anne ;
Proudhon, Charlotte ;
Bidard, Francois-Clement .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01)
[9]   Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics [J].
Diehl, Frank ;
Schmidt, Kerstin ;
Choti, Michael A. ;
Romans, Katharine ;
Goodman, Steven ;
Li, Meng ;
Thornton, Katherine ;
Agrawal, Nishant ;
Sokoll, Lori ;
Szabo, Steve A. ;
Kinzler, Kenneth W. ;
Vogelstein, Bert ;
Diaz, Luis A., Jr. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2008, 14 (09) :985-990
[10]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247