Exploring the Benefits to Caregivers of a Family-Oriented Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program

被引:21
作者
Figueiredo, Daniela [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, Joana [3 ,4 ]
Jacome, Cristina [3 ]
Marques, Alda [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Sch Hlth Sci, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res CINTESIS UA, Oporto, Portugal
[3] Univ Aveiro ESSUA, Sch Hlth Sci, Resp Res & Rehabil Lab, Lab 3R, Aveiro, Portugal
[4] Univ Aveiro, Inst Res Biomed iBiMED, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
burden; COPD; coping; emotional state; family caregiving; CANCER-PATIENTS; INTERVENTION; CARERS; COPD; DEPRESSION; DISEASE; ANXIETY; STRATEGIES; EXPERIENCE; RELATIVES;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.04624
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: COPD is a highly incapacitating disease, particularly among older people, implying significant burden for family caregivers. Involving caregivers in comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programs might benefit their functional coping to care demands; however, there is no objective evidence to sustain such assumption. This study is a secondary analysis aiming to analyze the effects of a family-based pulmonary rehabilitation program on close family caregivers of older subjects with COPD. METHODS: This is a mixed-method study. Family caregivers were randomly assigned to family-based (experimental) or conventional (control) pulmonary rehabilitation. Caregivers from the family-based pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 20; 80.0% female; age 63.1 +/- 9.5 y) attended the psychoeducational component together with their relatives. In the conventional pulmonary rehabilitation, caregivers did not participate (n = 19; 68.4% female; age 53.6 +/- 11.3 y). Self-rated instruments (Family Crisis Oriented Personal Scales, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales, and Carers' Assessment of Difficulties Index) and focus group interviews were used to assess the intervention. RESULTS: Caregivers from the family-based pulmonary rehabilitation had significantly greater improvements in overall family coping (P = .01), reframing (P = .01), seeking spiritual support (P = .01), and mobilizing to acquire help (P = .02). No significant differences were found for emotional state. Significant improvements in overall burden (P = .01), reactions to caregiving (P = .01), physical demands of caring (P = .044), and poor family support (P = .038) were observed, although there were no significant between-group differences. Qualitative data sustained the benefits of involving family caregivers in pulmonary rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide valuable evidence to recommend the inclusion of COPD family caregivers in comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation. Family-oriented pulmonary rehabilitation maximizes caregivers' adaptive coping and potentially prevents negative psychological outcomes; however, further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1089
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SO ONLINE J NURS RES
[2]  
Azevedo O., 2007, CONFIGURACOES ESTRUT
[3]  
Bailey A, 1999, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V12, P336, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199910)12:5<336::AID-ART5>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-E
[5]   'The Hidden Client' - women caring for husbands with COPD: their experience of quality of life [J].
Bergs, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2002, 11 (05) :613-621
[6]  
Brito L., 2002, A saude mental dos prestadores de cuidados a familiares idosos
[7]   A review of the information and support needs of family carers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Caress, Ann-Louise ;
Luker, Karen A. ;
Chalmers, Karen I. ;
Salmon, Margaret P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (04) :479-491
[8]   Carers Assessment of Difficulties Index (CADI): Psychometric properties for use with carers of people with dementia [J].
Charlesworth, G. M. ;
Tzimoula, X. M. ;
Newman, S. P. .
AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2007, 11 (02) :218-225
[9]   proFamilies: a psycho-educational multi-family group intervention for cancer patients and their families [J].
Chiquelho, R. ;
Neves, S. ;
Mendes, A. ;
Relvas, A. P. ;
Sousa, L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2011, 20 (03) :337-344
[10]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]